- From: Jakub Klímek via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 07:51:33 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@makxdekkers I see your point, but from practice I can say that when you already have an IRI for a `dcat:Dataset` which you have to maintain (an I think we both agree that those should not be blank nodes), it is usually not a problem to also maintain an IRI `<datasetIRI>/temporal` and such. Regarding the implementers, they should primarily do what works for the users, and the specification should guide them in that way. In my opinion, we should simply convey that minting IRIs for everything is the normal thing to do, and using blank nodes has only disadvantages in the world of data on the web. Then, if they still decide to use blank nodes, they know it is not good and so do the users. Btw see for instance the [Richard Cyganiak's blog post regarding blank nodes](http://richard.cyganiak.de/blog/2011/03/blank-nodes-considered-harmful/). -- GitHub Notification of comment by jakubklimek Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/300#issuecomment-415681681 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 24 August 2018 07:51:34 UTC