I assume this is to assist in managing representations of standards/profiles? I'd favour the superclass/super-property route. **Dataset --> Distribution** is a well-known terminology in the data space, but elsewhere **Resource --> Representation** is more typical. So how about ``` dcat:hasRepresentation a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:domain dcat:Resource ; rdfs:range dcat:Representation . dcat:distribution rdfs:subPropertyOf dcat:hasRepresentation . dcat:Representation a owl:Class . dcat:Distribution rdfs:subClassOf dcat:Representation . ``` -- GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/317#issuecomment-414918100 using your GitHub accountReceived on Wednesday, 22 August 2018 05:42:30 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:28:24 UTC