- From: Simon Cox via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 00:53:46 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
I agree that a discussion on this topic is meritted. But I am not sure an additional property is warranted. Too many ways to do the same thing has a cost. While a more flexible property makes things easier for the data provider, it creates more work for the consumer. I believe `dcat:byteSize` is enough, though I suggest that its range should be `xsd:positiveInteger` (which is a valid OWL-2 datatype - see https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-quick-reference/#Built-in_Datatypes ). -- GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/313#issuecomment-412384105 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 13 August 2018 00:53:48 UTC