- From: Simon Cox via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2018 07:21:34 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@dvh I agree that "CRS is comparable with 'language'". And while CRS might be managed as just another (orthogonal) facet for conneg, it is more esoteric than the ones already on the table. - format/mime-type - language - profile/schema/view Adding CRS to the conneg params is more in scope for the SDWIG than DXWG? @rob-metalinkage I'd also suggest not muddying the waters too much with spatial type (another SDWIG issue) or general parameters like temporal position. -- GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/311#issuecomment-410612403 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 6 August 2018 07:21:42 UTC