W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > September 2017

RE: Organizing/prioritizing requirements

From: Svensson, Lars <L.Svensson@dnb.de>
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2017 09:01:59 +0000
To: Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au>
CC: "public-dxwg-wg@w3.org" <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <24637769D123E644A105A0AF0E1F92EF010D31F4BD@dnbf-ex1.AD.DDB.DE>
Hello,

> Perhaps the "negotiation by profiles" team (and I am happy to put my hand
> up for this) can identify which requirements affect negotiation - this is
> probably quite minimal - maybe just a definition of profile, some descriptions
> and use of HTTP identifiers,

Ruben, Herbert and I have collected requirements for profile negotiation [1]. We're probably not fully complete yet but the most important should be there. I have the impression that we list requirements that are not yet in the UCR document, so perhaps we need more use cases to back up those...

[1] https://github.com/ProfileNegotiation/I-D-Accept--Schema/wiki/Requirements


Best,

Lars
 
> On Fri, 1 Sep 2017 at 01:48 Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> wrote:
> All,
> 
> We have a very important task on our agenda now, which is to determine
> the requirements for the three deliverables. This is also quite a
> complex task. Although this is directly a task for the UCR group, it
> needs the attention of the entire working group.
> 
> Ideally, at this point we would be able to gather together in room with
> Post-It(tm) notes (and a lot of coffee) and we could organize the
> requirements around concepts and deliverables as a group activity. As
> our next face-to-face is much too far away, we need to find a way to do
> this work virtually.
> 
> Some possible organizing principles are:
> 
> - which requirements are for which deliverables? (Yes, some requirements
> may be valid for more than one deliverable.)
> - what are the logical categories that requirements fall into within
> each deliverable?
> - what is the priority for each requirement? (e.g. absolutely required;
> required if possible; nice to have but not required)
> 
> Following are some examples from previous working groups that the team
> is aware of. If you know of others please reply with them.
> 
> - https://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp/#challenges (DWBP challenges)
> - https://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp/#requirements (DWBP requirements)
> - https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl-ucr/#requirements (SHACL requirements)
> 
> Please give some time to this and share an ideas with the group.
> 
> kc for the team
> --
> Karen Coyle
> kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net

> m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal)
> skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Monday, 4 September 2017 09:02:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 October 2019 00:15:38 UTC