- From: Jaroslav Pullmann <jaroslav.pullmann@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 11:49:56 +0200
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Dear Karen, dear all, > determine the requirements for the three deliverables couldn't we use the tags to filter accordingly? There are 3 deliverable tags (content_negotiation, dcat, profile) with every use case tagged with at least one of them. The spec reader might create a view filtered by deliverable and further tags. Only matching use cases and their related requirements were visible: Tag > UC > Req. Does this simple approach fit the task or are there exceptions, where e.g. requirements are relevant for a deliverable while none of the related UCs does? Best regards Jaroslav > Some possible organizing principles are: > > - which requirements are for which deliverables? (Yes, some requirements > may be valid for more than one deliverable.) > - what are the logical categories that requirements fall into within > each deliverable? > - what is the priority for each requirement? (e.g. absolutely required; > required if possible; nice to have but not required) > > Following are some examples from previous working groups that the team > is aware of. If you know of others please reply with them. > > - https://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp/#challenges (DWBP challenges) > - https://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp/#requirements (DWBP requirements) > - https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl-ucr/#requirements (SHACL requirements) > > Please give some time to this and share an ideas with the group. > > kc for the team > -- Jaroslav Pullmann Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology FIT User-Centered Ubiquitous Computing Schloss Birlinghoven | D-53757 Sankt Augustin | Germany Phone: +49-2241-143620 | Fax: +49-2241-142146
Received on Friday, 1 September 2017 09:51:00 UTC