Re: Formation of DCAT group

Hi Karen,

I've created a Pull Request for you to review, where I included the 
initial sections of DCAT 1.0 into our working document:

https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/39

I added a note on each section indicating that it is text from the 
previous spec.

Thanks,

Alejandra


On 17/11/2017 04:07, Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran wrote:
> Hi Karen,
>
> I can take care of putting the DCAT spec into the DCAT 1.1 in github 
> to use as our document.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alejandra
>
>
> On 16/11/2017 19:46, Karen Coyle wrote:
>> Thanks, Alejandra. And thanks to DaveB. If the two of you can get the
>> ball rolling on this that would be great.
>>
>> Since DCAT 1.1 is to be built on DCAT, it seems that we could get
>> started by copying the DCAT document to our github, drop the old dates
>> and other items, rename it to DCAT 1.1, and declare this our working
>> document. It does mean working in github and respec, so some drafting
>> may take place elsewhere, but the basics would be there to make it easy
>> to copy code and styles.
>>
>> If either of you wants to do this, that's fine. If you'd like me to do
>> it, I don't mind.
>>
>> So, it looks like DCAT 1.1 is beginning!
>>
>> kc
>>
>> On 11/16/17 8:34 AM, Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran wrote:
>>> Hi Karen, All,
>>>
>>> I am still keen on participating on the DCAT group as an editor and
>>> would be happy to organise the meetings and track the work, etc for the
>>> group.
>>>
>>> I take this opportunity to let you know that I will be traveling next
>>> week attending a workshop, and I am unsure if I will be able to join 
>>> the
>>> call, so possibly speak with you all the following week.
>>>
>>> Many thanks,
>>>
>>> Alejandra
>>>
>>>
>>> On 15/11/2017 01:39, Karen Coyle wrote:
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> Now that we have a set of requirements for DCAT that are complete or
>>>> nearly so, it is time to jump start the actual writing of the DCAT 1.1
>>>> document. For this to happen, we need one or two folks who will 
>>>> take on
>>>> the task of managing (chairing) this group. These people may or may 
>>>> not
>>>> also be primary editors, but their key task will be to make sure that
>>>> the group meets, does its work, and meets deadlines (which we should
>>>> talk about very soon, preferably at the next call). Without this 
>>>> kind of
>>>> leadership the standard is not likely to be produced.
>>>>
>>>> Please consider if you would be able to do this, and let us know. The
>>>> team will be available to help wherever we can, but the energy for 
>>>> this
>>>> needs to come from you.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> kc
>>>
>>>
>
>

Received on Monday, 20 November 2017 03:50:59 UTC