- From: Ruben Verborgh <Ruben.Verborgh@UGent.be>
- Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 12:26:50 +0000
- To: "kcoyle@kcoyle.net" <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- CC: "public-dxwg-wg@w3.org" <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Hi Karen, > Ruben, I think this is a variant view of profiles, so we should discuss > it as a group. The APs that exist today for DCAT are complete > descriptions of all of the elements of a metadata schema. Just a reminder that there is a difference between "profile" in the generic sense, and "DCAT profile" in the specific sense. So there is no contradiction, as I was talking about generic profiles. Also, not all profiles have to be "combinable", so it is fine if DCAT profiles are not. > As I read them > they cannot be combined as they are, nor can parts or fragments be > combined as new profiles because they haven't been designed to be > uniformly combinable. That is an interesting interpretation but not one > that we have yet as a requirement. We should, I think. It follows from 5.3. Best, Ruben
Received on Saturday, 18 November 2017 12:27:18 UTC