- From: <mail@makxdekkers.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 19:45:16 +0100
- To: <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Karen, > Not all access to APs will be through content negotiation, AFAIK, so we have to consider > other access avenues, such as a document at is located on a web site, profiles in wikis, etc. The expressions of the profile might be at http://example.org/profiles/xyz/profile.rdf http://example.org/profiles/xyz/profile.xml http://example.org/profiles/xyz/profile.json So it would be possible to access them without content negotiation. But I guess, we need to consider content negotiation because our deliverable is called "Content Negotiation by Application Profile" > If there is a "concept" AP it needs to be something that can be represented, > thus is not entirely abstract. In my mind, it *is* "abstract" in the same sense that FRBR Work is an abstract entity. Makx.
Received on Wednesday, 6 December 2017 18:45:50 UTC