- From: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
- Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 11:56:14 -0800
- To: Martial.Honsberger@bfs.admin.ch
- Cc: public-dxwg-comments@w3.org
- Message-Id: <C2376D25-7431-46B0-88E5-1DC5466906E1@lbl.gov>
This is a really good question. We ought to support semantic versioning, but our next/previous only supports linear versioning. I wonder if we should consider nextMajorVersion, nextMinorVersion, nextPatchVersion, previousMajorVersion, previousMinorVersion, previousPatchVersion? -Annette > On Dec 13, 2022, at 5:00 AM, Martial.Honsberger@bfs.admin.ch wrote: > > Hello, > I have a question about the implementation of Versioning in DCAT 3. > > Using the dcat:previousVersion, I can find a previous Version of a dataset. > Let’s say we have the following versioning example : > Classification v1.0 > Classification v1.1 > Classification v2.0 > If I set previousVersion to Classification v1.0 for v1.1 as well as for v2.0, what would be the inverse property nextVersion ? Would it be v1.1 and v2.0 (multiple values) or is it forbidden to set two datasets on the same previous version ? > > Furthermore, how is meant to be evaluated the value of “hasCurrentVersion” ? Should this be manually set or would this be “calculated” by means of subsequents previousVersion sets ? > > Thank you in advance for your help > > Martial Honsberger > Spécialiste en Interopérabilité > > Département fédéral de l'intérieur DFI > Office fédéral de la statistique OFS > > Espace de l'Europe 10, CH-2010 Neuchâtel > Tel. +41 58 467 10 03 > martial.honsberger@bfs.admin.ch <mailto:martial.honsberger@bfs.admin.ch> > http://www.statistique.admin.ch <http://www.statistique.admin.ch/>
Received on Thursday, 15 December 2022 19:56:30 UTC