- From: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 16:20:25 -0800
- To: Doug Schepers <standards@schepers.cc>, Data on the Web Best Practices CG <public-dwbp@w3.org>
Hi Doug, I'm interested in data viz and accessibility, too. One question I have about the concept of doing a best practices doc for data viz on the web is how we might bound such an endeavor. Since techniques and libraries for data viz are changing at a rapid pace, I think we would want to somehow limit to things that are best practices independent of the library used. Yet, I don't think we would want to try to write a spec for how to create good data viz that is only about design choices, as that would have little to do with the web per se, and there are tons of other resources for that. The accessibility angle is good. What else would fit the sweet spot of being web-appropriate and sufficiently library independent? Maybe . . . - the characteristics of a good viz library - connecting to data securely - optimizing performance - copyright issues what else? -Annette On 2/21/17 1:36 PM, Doug Schepers wrote: > Hi, folks– > > I'm Doug Schepers. I'm happy to be part of this group. I came in > toward the very last bit of the publication of the Data on the Web > Best Practices spec, to offer a few small suggestions and to help with > making the diagrams in the spec more accessible. > > … which is a perfect lead-in to my personal interest, which is the > accessibility of data visualizations and other graphics. I have some > ideas about a spec focused on Data Visualization Best Practices, > intended to complement and supplement the recent Data on the Web Best > Practices recommendation, and embody it in the particular medium of > dataviz. > > If anyone else is interested in this, let me know. > > Thanks– > Doug > -- Annette Greiner NERSC Data and Analytics Services Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2017 00:21:02 UTC