Re: Help with Data Quality example

Hi Berna,
I don't mind including them again, but I am afraid I won't be able to do it
before next week.
I hope that is not a big problem.
Cheers,
Riccardo



On 4 May 2016 at 23:43, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br> wrote:

> Hi Riccardo,
>
> I'm sorry but I had problems using the RDFa annotations :(
>
> Do you mind of including them again?
>
> Thanks a lot!
> Berna
>
> 2016-05-04 17:59 GMT-03:00 Riccardo Albertoni <
> riccardo.albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>:
>
>> Hi  Bernadette,
>>
>> It looks good to me.
>> Just a minor remark,    in the previous version  of the human readable
>> example page, I had inserted    some RDFa annotations for DQV statement
>> that have disappeared in the current version.
>> Actually the DQV related triples  are not distilled anymore by the RDFa
>> 1.1 validator ( see [2]). Not a real problem, but I am mentioning  it since
>>  I am not sure  whether  that was meant to be or  it  is an unexpected side
>> effect of  latest  page changes.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Riccardo
>>
>>
>> [2]
>> http://www.w3.org/2012/pyRdfa/extract?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fw3c.github.io%2Fdwbp%2Fdwbp-example.html&rdfa_lite=false&vocab_expansion=false&embedded_rdf=true&validate=yes&space_preserve=true&vocab_cache_report=false&vocab_cache_bypass=false
>>
>> On 4 May 2016 at 20:55, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Riccardo,
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot for your feedback! In this case, for one dimension, we can
>>> use different measures for different distributions/datasets. Is that right?
>>>
>>> Then, the only information that could be general is the definition of
>>> the dimensions. As we wont have a separate document to describe the
>>> dimensions, I think we can keep the definitions together with the measures
>>> and values.
>>>
>>> Doing this[1], the only change is the inclusion of the data quality
>>> information as part of the CSV distribution rather than as a separate
>>> section. Could you please take a look and tell me if this is ok?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Berna
>>>
>>> [1] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/dwbp-example.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2016-05-04 12:58 GMT-03:00 Riccardo Albertoni <
>>> riccardo.albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>:
>>>
>>>> Dear BP Editors,
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately, the values should be associated to Metrics not
>>>> dimensions, as  you can have more than one metric for the same dimension,
>>>>
>>>>  I would  consider to change the Human readable example, as in the
>>>> following
>>>>
>>>> a) In the section "Data Quality values", you can add the metric
>>>> description, for example,
>>>>
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> (Measured ??)  Dimension |   (Deployed ??)  Metric    |  value  |
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Availability | dcat:downloadURL is available and if its value is
>>>> dereferenceable| True (boolean)
>>>> Completeness | Ratio between the number of objects represented in the
>>>> cvs and the number of objects expected to be represented according to the
>>>> declared dataset scope. |  0.5 (Double)
>>>>
>>>> b) in section "Quality Dimensions and Metrics", you can change the
>>>>  section title in "Quality Dimensions", and  you can delete the metric
>>>> column in the table. It should result in something like,
>>>> -------------------------------
>>>> Dimension |   Definition
>>>> ---------------------------------
>>>> Completeness | Refers to the degree to which all required information
>>>> is present in a particular dataset.
>>>> Availability | Availability of a dataset is the extent to which data
>>>> (or some portion of it) is present, obtainable and ready for use.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The above solution is perhaps less  appealing, but it is closer to the
>>>> data quality vocabulary model.
>>>> Does it work for you?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Riccardo
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 4 May 2016 at 17:17, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear DQV editors,
>>>>>
>>>>> We are making the final updates on the DWBP document and we'd like to
>>>>> ask your help with the human-readable version of the data quality metadata
>>>>> [1].
>>>>>
>>>>> We made some changes on the html page with the human-readable metadata
>>>>> and we changed the way that the data quality metadata is presented. Now the
>>>>> values of the data quality dimensions are part of the description of the
>>>>> CSV distribution. Please, take a look and tell us if this makes sense.
>>>>>
>>>>> We also noticed that the description of dimensions and metrics is
>>>>> general and maybe could be in another page rather than in the dataset page.
>>>>> Does it make sense for you or do you think its better to keep these
>>>>> descriptions together with the dataset description?
>>>>>
>>>>> Looking forward to your feedback!
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> BP Editors
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/dwbp-example.html
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
>>>>> Centro de Informática
>>>>> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
>>>>>
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
>>>>> *E.F.A. Project* <http://www.efa-project.org>, and is believed to be
>>>>> clean.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Riccardo Albertoni
>>>> Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche "Enrico
>>>> Magenes"
>>>> Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
>>>> via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA
>>>> tel. +39-010-6475624 - fax +39-010-6475660
>>>> e-mail: Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it
>>>> Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/
>>>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni
>>>> www: *MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from
>>>> "www.ge.imati.cnr.it" claiming to be* http://www.imati.cnr.it/
>>>> <http://www.ge.imati.cnr.it/Albertoni>
>>>> http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni
>>>> FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
>>> Centro de Informática
>>> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Riccardo Albertoni
>> Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche "Enrico
>> Magenes"
>> Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
>> via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA
>> tel. +39-010-6475624 - fax +39-010-6475660
>> e-mail: Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it
>> Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/
>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni
>> www: *MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from
>> "www.ge.imati.cnr.it" claiming to be* http://www.imati.cnr.it/
>> <http://www.ge.imati.cnr.it/Albertoni>
>> http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni
>> FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
> Centro de Informática
> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>



-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Riccardo Albertoni
Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche "Enrico
Magenes"
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA
tel. +39-010-6475624 - fax +39-010-6475660
e-mail: Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it
Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni
www: http://www.imati.cnr.it/ <http://www.ge.imati.cnr.it/Albertoni>
http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni
FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Thursday, 5 May 2016 11:41:13 UTC