- From: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
- Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 18:43:08 -0300
- To: Riccardo Albertoni <riccardo.albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>
- Cc: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CANx1Pzxem2JiPc3msEMqMgbvE9pt_r_ushQL2QVHB5ch+-b64w@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Riccardo, I'm sorry but I had problems using the RDFa annotations :( Do you mind of including them again? Thanks a lot! Berna 2016-05-04 17:59 GMT-03:00 Riccardo Albertoni < riccardo.albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>: > Hi Bernadette, > > It looks good to me. > Just a minor remark, in the previous version of the human readable > example page, I had inserted some RDFa annotations for DQV statement > that have disappeared in the current version. > Actually the DQV related triples are not distilled anymore by the RDFa > 1.1 validator ( see [2]). Not a real problem, but I am mentioning it since > I am not sure whether that was meant to be or it is an unexpected side > effect of latest page changes. > > Cheers, > Riccardo > > > [2] > http://www.w3.org/2012/pyRdfa/extract?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fw3c.github.io%2Fdwbp%2Fdwbp-example.html&rdfa_lite=false&vocab_expansion=false&embedded_rdf=true&validate=yes&space_preserve=true&vocab_cache_report=false&vocab_cache_bypass=false > > On 4 May 2016 at 20:55, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br> wrote: > >> Hi Riccardo, >> >> Thanks a lot for your feedback! In this case, for one dimension, we can >> use different measures for different distributions/datasets. Is that right? >> >> Then, the only information that could be general is the definition of the >> dimensions. As we wont have a separate document to describe the dimensions, >> I think we can keep the definitions together with the measures and values. >> >> Doing this[1], the only change is the inclusion of the data quality >> information as part of the CSV distribution rather than as a separate >> section. Could you please take a look and tell me if this is ok? >> >> Thanks! >> Berna >> >> [1] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/dwbp-example.html >> >> >> >> 2016-05-04 12:58 GMT-03:00 Riccardo Albertoni < >> riccardo.albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>: >> >>> Dear BP Editors, >>> >>> Unfortunately, the values should be associated to Metrics not >>> dimensions, as you can have more than one metric for the same dimension, >>> >>> I would consider to change the Human readable example, as in the >>> following >>> >>> a) In the section "Data Quality values", you can add the metric >>> description, for example, >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> (Measured ??) Dimension | (Deployed ??) Metric | value | >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Availability | dcat:downloadURL is available and if its value is >>> dereferenceable| True (boolean) >>> Completeness | Ratio between the number of objects represented in the >>> cvs and the number of objects expected to be represented according to the >>> declared dataset scope. | 0.5 (Double) >>> >>> b) in section "Quality Dimensions and Metrics", you can change the >>> section title in "Quality Dimensions", and you can delete the metric >>> column in the table. It should result in something like, >>> ------------------------------- >>> Dimension | Definition >>> --------------------------------- >>> Completeness | Refers to the degree to which all required information >>> is present in a particular dataset. >>> Availability | Availability of a dataset is the extent to which data >>> (or some portion of it) is present, obtainable and ready for use. >>> >>> >>> The above solution is perhaps less appealing, but it is closer to the >>> data quality vocabulary model. >>> Does it work for you? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Riccardo >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 4 May 2016 at 17:17, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Dear DQV editors, >>>> >>>> We are making the final updates on the DWBP document and we'd like to >>>> ask your help with the human-readable version of the data quality metadata >>>> [1]. >>>> >>>> We made some changes on the html page with the human-readable metadata >>>> and we changed the way that the data quality metadata is presented. Now the >>>> values of the data quality dimensions are part of the description of the >>>> CSV distribution. Please, take a look and tell us if this makes sense. >>>> >>>> We also noticed that the description of dimensions and metrics is >>>> general and maybe could be in another page rather than in the dataset page. >>>> Does it make sense for you or do you think its better to keep these >>>> descriptions together with the dataset description? >>>> >>>> Looking forward to your feedback! >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> BP Editors >>>> >>>> [1] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/dwbp-example.html >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Bernadette Farias Lóscio >>>> Centro de Informática >>>> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil >>>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> -- >>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by >>>> *E.F.A. Project* <http://www.efa-project.org>, and is believed to be >>>> clean. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Riccardo Albertoni >>> Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche "Enrico >>> Magenes" >>> Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche >>> via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA >>> tel. +39-010-6475624 - fax +39-010-6475660 >>> e-mail: Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it >>> Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/ >>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni >>> www: *MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from >>> "www.ge.imati.cnr.it" claiming to be* http://www.imati.cnr.it/ >>> <http://www.ge.imati.cnr.it/Albertoni> >>> http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni >>> FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Bernadette Farias Lóscio >> Centro de Informática >> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > > > -- > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Riccardo Albertoni > Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche "Enrico > Magenes" > Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche > via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA > tel. +39-010-6475624 - fax +39-010-6475660 > e-mail: Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it > Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/ > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni > www: http://www.imati.cnr.it/ <http://www.ge.imati.cnr.it/Albertoni> > http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni > FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- Bernadette Farias Lóscio Centro de Informática Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 4 May 2016 21:43:57 UTC