- From: Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <nmihindu@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:10:55 +0200
- To: Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>
- Cc: "Debattista, Jeremy" <Jeremy.Debattista@iais.fraunhofer.de>, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, DWBP Public List <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAOEr1m8bHiazGae5UniEuDxJOO7J3q22+9xFdLtS5dXE6EQJQ@mail.gmail.com>
Dear Riccardo, Thanks for starting the implementations wiki page. In the LDP WG [1], we collected few more details such as License, Language, Platform for the tools. However, if we don't want the wiki to have a lot of details, the current structure looks good. Best Regards, Nandana [1] https://www.w3.org/wiki/LDP_Implementations On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 7:27 PM, Riccardo Albertoni < albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it> wrote: > Dear All, > As discussed with Jeremy, > I have started a wiki page [1] for collecting the existing DQV's > implementations. The page contains two tables, the first is for > collecting portals, ontologies, and tools reusing DQV, the second is > for papers which cite/refer to DQV. > > Before adding the missing instances of tools, papers, Do you > think that there are other details or kind of artifacts, we should > consider? > > Let me know if you have any suggestions. > > Thanks, > Riccardo > > [1] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/List_of_DQV_implementations > > On 14 June 2016 at 09:59, Debattista, Jeremy > <Jeremy.Debattista@iais.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > > Hi Riccardo, > > > >> Said that, your comment reveals that this design choice can be > misunderstood, Do you think we should add a note or a sentence to make > our point clearer? > > > > Yes I think a note would make this clearer :) > > > > > >> Collecting the DQV implementations is a good idea, but I am not sure > we should list them in the DQV Document. Very soon, we are supposed > to have the final DQV vote, and after the last vote, we are not allowed to > update the document anymore. > >> Then the risk is to leave out many of the implementations that are > still in progress. > >> > >> What do you think about having the implementations collected in a > the w3c DWBP wiki page? A wiki page can be easily maintained after the > vote and I guess we are allowed to refer to such a page from the DQV > document. > > > > Perfect, we can start with the wiki page and maybe make a link in the > DQV page pointing to it. > > > > Cheers, > > Jer > > > > -- > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Riccardo Albertoni > Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche "Enrico > Magenes" > Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche > via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA > tel. +39-010-6475624 - fax +39-010-6475660 > e-mail: Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it > Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/ > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni > www: http://www.imati.cnr.it/ > http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni > FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf > >
Received on Thursday, 16 June 2016 08:11:40 UTC