Re: DWBP Evidences Form

Hi Makx,

We made a few changes on the form regarding your feedback.

1) Changes on the last paragraph;

2) Splitting the form in two parts: Contact information and Publisher 
information;

Below I answer your comments.

> Comment on the Organization info:
> What is the role of the 'name' and 'email' on the form?
In order to get the contact of the person who is evaluating the BPs.
> Should that be for a person affiliated to the organisation mentioned, or should it be the person who submits the evidence?
It can be a person affiliated to the organization, or it can be someone 
else who is only submitting a test of other organization.

It wasn't clear in the form. Could you please check if it's better now?

> In my case, I am not affiliated to the organisation for which I submit the reference.
>
> (Note that I entered a fake organisation record so that I could see the individual evidences)
>
> On the Best Practice evidence block:
> In my case, 'evidence' will be a reference to a guideline.
Makx, as far as I remember we discussed once about this point - if 
guidelines count as evidences as well datasets or APIs do, and I think 
it doesn't count as a implementation evidence according to the W3C 
process, but I think we could double-check with @Phila
> In that case 'pass' will be that there is compatible advice in the guidelines; should I mention that in the comments?
> I might not be able in all cases to provide a resolvable URI for the evidence. E.g. one set of guidelines that I'll be linking to is only available in PDF through a landing page. In that case, I can refer in the comments to a section or page number in the document where the 'evidence' can be found.
Yes, every comment you can provide will be useful, and in that case you 
have the resource on a landing page you can explain where the evidence 
is found.

Makx, would you mind checking the changes we made on the last paragraph 
and if you have any suggestion, even about the English phrasing, to 
rephrase it in order to make the instructions clear for who is going to 
fill the form, it will be very welcome :-)

Cheers,
Newton

>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Newton Calegari [mailto:newton@nic.br]
> Sent: 08 July 2016 05:03
> To: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
> Subject: DWBP Evidences Form
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have uploaded the DWBP Evidences Form to the server and it's available at [1].
>
> I kindly ask you all to test and validate it, and if you have any feedback, feel free to suggest any improvement here by email or on the next call.
>
> The idea to fill the form is the following:
>
>       first provide information about the organization which is implementing the BPs;
>       after this information is provided, a list of all BPs is shown and the user answers only those BPs that are been implemented;
>       it's possible to duplicate the same BP in order to provide more than once evidence for each BP;
>
> cheers,
>
> Newton
>
> 1: http://w3c.br/form-dwbp/
>
>
>

Received on Friday, 15 July 2016 04:39:22 UTC