Re: Ordinary Working Draft Publication request

Agh! I forgot.

The WG would like this to be published tomorrow, Thursday 28th.

On 27/01/2016 09:07, Phil Archer wrote:
> The Data on the Web Best Practices WG would like to publish an update to
> its Dataset Usage Vocabulary.
>
> Document URI:
>
> https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-vocab-duv-20160128/
>
>
> Record of WG's resolution to publish:
>
> https://www.w3.org/2016/01/22-dwbp-minutes.html#resolution02
>
> The document is installed and complies with all the rules with the
> following exceptions:
>
> - There's a link to https://www.w3.org/ns/oa#Annotation. This fragment
> is correct in terms of the RDF vocabulary, i.e. that *is* the correct
> URL. However, the HTML representation of the vocabulary has different
> fragment IDs (annoyingly) so for HTML the link should be
> https://www.w3.org/ns/oa#d4e434 - but that's just confusing. #Annotation
> is correct and I have not  changed it for that reason.
>
> - Pubrules complains about the patent policy line because it (correctly)
> states that the WG does not expect this to become a Recommendation. The
> other text and links are correct.
>
> I'll send text for the homepage to Maria.
>
> Thanks
>
> Phil.
>
>

-- 


Phil Archer
W3C Data Activity Lead
http://www.w3.org/2013/data/

http://philarcher.org
+44 (0)7887 767755
@philarcher1

Received on Wednesday, 27 January 2016 09:08:27 UTC