- From: Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 12:29:51 -0800
- To: Denis Ah-Kang <denis@w3.org>
- Cc: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>, Webmaster <webreq@w3.org>, "Purohit, Sumit" <Sumit.Purohit@pnnl.gov>, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>, Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>, W3C- Archive <w3c-archive@w3.org>
Thank you all! Kind regards, The DUV Editors Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 27, 2016, at 1:54 AM, Denis Ah-Kang <denis@w3.org> wrote: > > Hi Phil, > > The document is ready and will be published tomorrow. > > Regards, > > Denis > >> On 01/27/2016 01:08 PM, Phil Archer wrote: >> Agh! I forgot. >> >> The WG would like this to be published tomorrow, Thursday 28th. >> >>> On 27/01/2016 09:07, Phil Archer wrote: >>> The Data on the Web Best Practices WG would like to publish an update to >>> its Dataset Usage Vocabulary. >>> >>> Document URI: >>> >>> https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-vocab-duv-20160128/ >>> >>> >>> Record of WG's resolution to publish: >>> >>> https://www.w3.org/2016/01/22-dwbp-minutes.html#resolution02 >>> >>> The document is installed and complies with all the rules with the >>> following exceptions: >>> >>> - There's a link to https://www.w3.org/ns/oa#Annotation. This fragment >>> is correct in terms of the RDF vocabulary, i.e. that *is* the correct >>> URL. However, the HTML representation of the vocabulary has different >>> fragment IDs (annoyingly) so for HTML the link should be >>> https://www.w3.org/ns/oa#d4e434 - but that's just confusing. #Annotation >>> is correct and I have not changed it for that reason. >>> >>> - Pubrules complains about the patent policy line because it (correctly) >>> states that the WG does not expect this to become a Recommendation. The >>> other text and links are correct. >>> >>> I'll send text for the homepage to Maria. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Phil. >>
Received on Wednesday, 27 January 2016 20:30:24 UTC