Re: DUV Comments

 

Thank you Eric, 

The label that I pointed is an entry listed for each property. The label
entry for the property duv:hasDistributionFeedback is defined as "has
target ". Maybe the correct would be "has distribution feedback". 

Cheers, 
Laufer 

---
. . . .. . . 
. . . ..
. .. . 

Em 19/01/2016 3:56, Eric Stephan escreveu: 

> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 7:30 AM, Laufer <laufer@globo.com> wrote:
> 
>> Dear Editors, 
>> 
>> Thank you for the updates in the DUV document. 
>> 
>> Some comments about the new document: 
>> 
>> 1. The issue to replace the properties duv:hasUsage and duv:hasUserFeedback is analogous to the issue that occurs for the property duv:refersTo. But the property refersTo was not updated.
> 
> This is corrected and will show up in the next commit. 
> 
>> 2. There are parts of the document that do not reflect the updates of the properties. (Section 6.2, Section 6.3, Example 1, Example 2)
> 
> Yes this will be corrected. 
> 
>> 3. It seems to me that the labels of the properties duv:duv:hasUserFeedback and duv:hasDistributionUserFeedback are incorrect.
> 
> It is unclear to me what your concern is here. I did make duv:hasDatasetFeedback and duv:DistributionFeedback properties as you recommended last month. 
> 
>> 4. The property duv:hasUserFeedback is still listed in section 7.5.
> 
> Yes this has been corrected 
> 
>> Obs: Maybe it would be interesting to still have the old properties without the multiple domain (range) constraints, and the new ones as subproperties. In that way, the properties could be reused in different usages and feedbacks. But this can be discussed after the publication of this version of the document
> 
> I'll raise this as a general issue. 
> 
>> Thank you again 
>> 
>> Cheers, 
>> Laufer 
>> 
>> -- 
>> . . . .. . . 
>> . . . ..
>> . .. .