Re: DUV Comments

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 7:30 AM, Laufer <laufer@globo.com> wrote:

>
> Dear Editors,
>
> Thank you for the updates in the DUV document.
>
> Some comments about the new document:
>
> 1. The issue to replace the properties duv:hasUsage and
> duv:hasUserFeedback is analogous to the issue that occurs for the property
> duv:refersTo. But the property refersTo was not updated.
>
>
This is corrected and will show up in the next commit.


> 2. There are parts of the document that do not reflect the updates of the
> properties. (Section 6.2, Section 6.3, Example 1, Example 2)
>
>
Yes this will be corrected.


> 3. It seems to me that the labels of the properties
> duv:duv:hasUserFeedback and duv:hasDistributionUserFeedback are incorrect.
>

It is unclear to me what your concern is here.  I did make
duv:hasDatasetFeedback and duv:DistributionFeedback properties as you
recommended last month.

>
> 4. The property duv:hasUserFeedback is still listed in section 7.5.
>
>
Yes this has been corrected


> Obs: Maybe it would be interesting to still have the old properties
> without the multiple domain (range) constraints, and the new ones as
> subproperties. In that way, the properties could be reused in different
> usages and feedbacks. But this can be discussed after the publication of
> this version of the document
>
>
I'll raise this as a general issue.


> Thank you again
>
> Cheers,
> Laufer
>
> --
>
> .  .  .  .. .  .
> .        .   . ..
> .     ..       .
>
>
>