- From: Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 21:56:16 -0800
- To: Laufer <laufer@globo.com>
- Cc: DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMFz4jhtCgecFbTt20RitJ08dUB_CvwvNCdiYh6-JkxyD1SFRQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 7:30 AM, Laufer <laufer@globo.com> wrote: > > Dear Editors, > > Thank you for the updates in the DUV document. > > Some comments about the new document: > > 1. The issue to replace the properties duv:hasUsage and > duv:hasUserFeedback is analogous to the issue that occurs for the property > duv:refersTo. But the property refersTo was not updated. > > This is corrected and will show up in the next commit. > 2. There are parts of the document that do not reflect the updates of the > properties. (Section 6.2, Section 6.3, Example 1, Example 2) > > Yes this will be corrected. > 3. It seems to me that the labels of the properties > duv:duv:hasUserFeedback and duv:hasDistributionUserFeedback are incorrect. > It is unclear to me what your concern is here. I did make duv:hasDatasetFeedback and duv:DistributionFeedback properties as you recommended last month. > > 4. The property duv:hasUserFeedback is still listed in section 7.5. > > Yes this has been corrected > Obs: Maybe it would be interesting to still have the old properties > without the multiple domain (range) constraints, and the new ones as > subproperties. In that way, the properties could be reused in different > usages and feedbacks. But this can be discussed after the publication of > this version of the document > > I'll raise this as a general issue. > Thank you again > > Cheers, > Laufer > > -- > > . . . .. . . > . . . .. > . .. . > > >
Received on Tuesday, 19 January 2016 05:56:43 UTC