- From: Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 07:33:03 -0800
- To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Cc: João Paulo Almeida <jpalmeida@ieee.org>, Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 15 January 2016 15:33:35 UTC
Phil, I like your idea, I'll put these changes in place. Eric On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 6:11 AM, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote: > > > On 15/01/2016 13:22, Eric Stephan wrote: > [..] > > >>> — Concerning the current diagram >>> ---------------------------------------------- >>> Rdfs:literal appears three times in the diagram. >>> Skos:Concept also appears three times >>> oa:Annotation appears two times. >>> foaf:Agent appears twice. >>> >>> >>> Eric feedback: Joao Paulo, we can try a diagram with only one class >> mentioned, do you think this is a showstopper for getting comments from >> others or can this wait until the next review? >> >> >> > My instinct is to agree, Joao Paulo, however, in this instance I'm not > sure I do. That's because the vocabulary has three distinct parts > (citation, feedback and usage) so I wouldn't necessarily expect to see just > one skos:Concept in the diagram. That said, the attached png shows an idea > for how to reduce the number of boxes in the usage area. > > Phil >
Received on Friday, 15 January 2016 15:33:35 UTC