- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 08:08:57 -0000
- To: "Denis Ah-Kang" <denis@w3.org>
- Cc: "Phil Archer" <phila@w3.org>, "Webmaster" <webreq@w3.org>, "Public DWBP WG" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Ah-ha! Well spotted, yes of course. I'll let you know when it's done. > Hi Phil, > > I uploaded the 'images' directory. However, there's still a broken link: > [[ > Line: 41 > http://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-dwbp-20160112/diff-dwbp-20160112.html > Status: 404 Not Found > ]] > > Can you please add the missing diff file? > > Thanks, > > Denis > > On 01/10/2016 09:29 PM, Phil Archer wrote: >> This is a publication request for an ordinary working draft. >> >> Proposed publication date: Tuesday 12 January 2016 >> >> Data on the Web Best Practices >> ============================== >> >> Document URI >> ============ >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-dwbp-20160112/ >> >> Please note that this is a near clone of the document published on 17 >> December. Notes on that publication request therefore apply here [1]. >> The reason for publication is the addition of an editors' note which is >> highlighted in the status section and the change log. >> >> *However* for reasons I do not understand, there's a problem with the >> images sub directory. I've uploaded it along with everything else, done >> the CVS commit - but it doesn't seem to have registered. So my CVS >> client and the server disagree on what is on the server. I am travelling >> between now and Tuesday so may have limited connectivity. To save time, >> the directory and its contents at /TR/2015/WD-dwbp-20151217/images can >> be cloned to create http://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-dwbp-20160112/images. >> >> Homepage news >> ============= >> >> <p>The <a href="/2013/dwbp/"Data on the Web Best Practices Working >> Group</a> has updated its <a href="/TR/2016/WD-dwbp-20160112/">Best >> Practices document</a>. This publication is designed to encourage and >> facilitate a greater sharing of data across the Web with greater >> consistency and therefore greater trust. What should publishers do? What >> metadata is essential? How can publishers encourage the maximum reuse of >> their data?</p> >> <p>The document published today is identical to that published on 17 >> December 2015 except that it draws attention to the instability of one >> best practice in particular. The Working Group is therefore most keen to >> receive feedback on that issue.</p> >> >> >> [1] >> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Dec/0115.html >> >> >> > -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse typos.
Received on Monday, 11 January 2016 08:09:07 UTC