- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:59:37 +0200
- To: <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Hi Annette, Thanks a lot for the feedback. I'm going to add checking these URLs as an editorial action. They have been here for a while, I have not checked them while adding the other bits of text around them. It could be that they never resolved. This maybe why we had added a link to the files where they are defined: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jiemakel/aether/master/void-ext.ttl Best, Antoine On 26/08/16 02:49, Annette Greiner wrote: > I cannot get the URLs for suggested terms to resolve in that table, but it looks good otherwise. > > -Annette > > > On 8/25/16 7:25 AM, Antoine Isaac wrote: >> Dear all (with special attn to Annette!) >> >> The DQV section about statistics has been slightly re-worked, to polish our text wrt. some issues mentioned in ISSUE-164 [1], ISSUE-189 [2] and the discussions around their resolution [3]. See >> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/vocab-dqg.html#Statistics >> >> Especially, Annette had suggested to "include some statistics that are more directly related to quality than the examples, which seem text-centric. Percentage of empty values and percentage of nulls come to mind." >> >> Is the current text ok with everyone? >> >> Note that I have also added >> "Guidance on how DQV can work with quality statistics vocabulary shall be provided with future versions of the DQV documentation." >> to our wishlist at >> https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Main_Page#Wish_List >> >> Thanks, >> >> Antoine >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/164 >> [2] http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/189 >> [3] http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2015-09-24#resolution_10 >> >
Received on Friday, 26 August 2016 10:00:08 UTC