Re: WG state of play

Hi Phil,



Bernadette and I are making final minor editorial changes including
addressing our outstanding issue (just really a minor word smithing  of how
we define UsageTool).  The other outstanding work is double checking the
definitions for some of the properties, a few of them as Berna as pointed
out are somewhat vague and need to be clarified.  There is also a note I
owe back to the OKFN to let them know the changes are in place that they
requested to acknowledge how the DUV can be used with other alternative
vocabularies.

Kind regards,

Eric Stephan



Eric

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 7:52 AM, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> With the BP doc Transition call just over 2 hours away I'm just checking
> the overall state of play for the WG.
>
> There are 4 open actions but these all relate to the i18n comments so am I
> right that they can now all be closed?
>
> I note a lot of traffic about the DQV on the comments list - that's very
> good to see. There's one from Amrapali Zeveri on 13 Aug but the latest DQV
> ED is dated 4 Aug so I take it that hasn't been acted on? Will it be before
> final publication? (please take this as an entirely neutral question, not
> as a demand for action).
>
> DUV looks stable? But I see Issue 234 still open
> https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/234
>
> As we line up in front of the Director - are we ready?
>
> Shout if you need me or others to do something.
>
> Phil.
>
>
> --
>
>
> Phil Archer
> W3C Data Activity Lead
> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
>
> http://philarcher.org
> +44 (0)7887 767755
> @philarcher1
>
>