Re: Remove the Data Vocabularies section from the DWBP document

Hi João Paulo,

I agree with you! However, I don't think that it is in the scope of the
DWBP document to provide BP for creating vocabularies.

Cheers,
Bernadette

2015-05-13 14:27 GMT-03:00 João Paulo Almeida <jpalmeida@ieee.org>:

> Dear Bernadette and All,
>
> What if there is no established data format or vocabulary for some domain
> which can be used to represent data in that domain? … so I don’t think we
> should restrict ourselves to talking about reusing an existing vocabulary,
> as is may be necessary to create a vocabulary in order to publish data.
>
> Regards,
> João Paulo
>
>
>
> From: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
> Date: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 1:40 PM
> To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
> Cc: "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: Remove the Data Vocabularies section from the DWBP document
> Resent-From: <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
> Resent-Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 16:41:06 +0000
>
> Hello Antoine,
>
> Please, find below the list of BP for Data Vocabularies and a brief
> explanation why IMO they are out of the scope of the DWBP document.
>
> Best Practice 14: Document vocabularies: this BP discusses how to document
> vocabularies instead of how to reuse vocabularies (There is also a
> redundancy between this BP and  Best Practice 1: Provide metadata).
>
> Best Practice 15: Share vocabularies in an open way: this best practice
> concerns how to share vocabularies instead of how to reuse them.
>
> Best Practice 16: Vocabulary versioning: this BP concerns how to identify
> changes to a vocabulary over time instead of how to reuse vocabularies
> (There is a BP that deals with dataset versioning - Best Practice 8:
> Provide versioning information).
>
> Best Practice 17: Re-use vocabularies: IMO this is the only BP that
> concerns the reuse of vocabularies. However, there is a redundancy between
> this and Best Practice 2: Use standard terms to define metadata
>
> Best Practice 18: Choose the right formalization level: again this BP
> concerns vocabularies creation instead of reuse of vocabularies.
>
> kind regards,
> Bernadette
>
> 2015-05-13 11:31 GMT-03:00 Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>:
>
>> -1.
>>
>> If there are redundancies between the MD BD and the Voc BP, then maybe
>> it's not a good sign for the MD BP themselves. They've probably be scoped
>> too widely... But what are precisely the redundancies you've spotted? We
>> probably need to know more.
>>
>> Second, I don't have a strong objection refering to the W3C Best
>> Practices for Publishing Linked Data.
>> But we already reached the conclusion that there was value reprising
>> those BPs because (1) that LD BPS were not an official W3C rec and (2) this
>> was an opportunity to write BP that would be less technically biased. I
>> don't see why we'd revisit this position, while it already had costed us
>> enough discussion time last year. Especially I wouldn't be ready to revisit
>> this position based on the fact that some other part of the document would
>> be redundant. That's not the right reason.
>>
>> Antoine
>>
>>
>> On 5/13/15 2:58 PM, Phil Archer wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On 13/05/2015 14:25, yaso@nic.br wrote:
>>>
>>>> Agreed, Berna
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On 05/13/2015 10:06 AM, Eric Stephan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> Eric S
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 6:01 AM, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <
>>>>> bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd like to propose to remove the Data Vocabularies section from the
>>>>>> DWBP
>>>>>> document. After reviewing the document, I believe that there is a lot
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> redundancy between the BP for data vocabularies and BP for metadata.
>>>>>> Besides, IMO the creation of vocabularies is not in the scope of the
>>>>>> document.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Instead of having a section for data vocabularies, we may refer to The
>>>>>> Standard Vocabularies section of the W3C Best Practices for Publishing
>>>>>> Linked Data.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Bernadette
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
>>>>>> Centro de Informática
>>>>>> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
> Centro de Informática
> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>



-- 
Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Centro de Informática
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Wednesday, 13 May 2015 17:36:41 UTC