Re: dwbp-ACTION-184: Review the existing template and identify any additional fields that could be added to improve the bp

Hi Peter,

Thanks a lot for the detailed explanation as well as the BP evaluation and
the references that you brought to us in the document. I think we can use
this information in our DWBP document.

I liked the explanation about the meaning of a BP, however IMO the creation
process of our BP is different from the one explained in the doc. In our
case, BP were proposed to solve problems/challenges faced by data on the
Web publishers and consumers as described in the Use Case Requirements
document [1]. Considering that data on the Web is a new area, then it is
hard to find "procedures that are accepted or prescribed as being correct
or most effective". So, our idea is to propose a new set of procedures
(based on our experiences as well as on the use cases from [1]) that will
be properly tested in different scenarios. The recommended BP should be the
ones "that has been proven to work well and produce good results".

Concerning the three missing areas that you pointed out in the document:
 (i) Forces or trade-offs, (ii) Resulting Context or Projected Outcome and
(iii) Participants or Related Patterns, I think it's gonna be easier to
identify (i) and (ii) after we have some running implementations. The third
point is also really interesting and IMO is something that is possible to
identify without implementations. So, we're gonna try to include this
relationship between BP into the next draft of the document.

Cheers,
Bernadette

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp-ucr/

2015-07-15 4:24 GMT-03:00 <Peter.Winstanley@scotland.gsi.gov.uk>:

> Please find attached some notes on the current template and suggestions
> for additions
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker [mailto:
> sysbot+tracker@w3.org]
> Sent: 10 July 2015 14:47
> To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
> Subject: dwbp-ACTION-184: Review the existing template and identify any
> additional fields that could be added to improve the bp
>
> dwbp-ACTION-184: Review the existing template and identify any additional
> fields that could be added to improve the bp
>
> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/184
>
> Assigned to: Peter Winstanley
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This email was scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus
> service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec.  (CCTM
> Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.)  In case of problems, please call your
> organisations IT Helpdesk.
> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
> recorded for legal purposes.
>
> *********************************** ********************************
> This email has been received from an external party and
> has been swept for the presence of computer viruses.
> ********************************************************************
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail (and any files or other attachments transmitted with it) is
> intended solely for the attention of the addressee(s). Unauthorised use,
> disclosure, storage, copying or distribution of any part of this e-mail is
> not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient please destroy the
> email, remove any copies from your system and inform the sender immediately
> by return.
>
> Communications with the Scottish Government may be monitored or recorded
> in order to secure the effective operation of the system and for other
> lawful purposes. The views or opinions contained within this e-mail may not
> necessarily reflect those of the Scottish Government.
>
>
> Tha am post-d seo (agus faidhle neo ceanglan  còmhla ris) dhan neach neo
> luchd-ainmichte a-mhàin. Chan eil e ceadaichte a chleachdadh ann an dòigh
> sam bith, a’ toirt a-steach còraichean, foillseachadh neo sgaoileadh,  gun
> chead. Ma ’s e is gun d’fhuair sibh seo le gun fhiosd’, bu choir cur às
> dhan phost-d agus lethbhreac sam bith air an t-siostam agaibh, leig fios
> chun  neach a sgaoil am post-d  gun dàil.
>
> Dh’fhaodadh gum bi teachdaireachd sam bith bho Riaghaltas na h-Alba air a
> chlàradh neo air a sgrùdadh airson dearbhadh gu bheil an siostam ag obair
> gu h-èifeachdach neo airson adhbhar laghail eile. Dh’fhaodadh nach  eil
> beachdan anns a’ phost-d seo co-ionann ri beachdan Riaghaltas na h-Alba.
> **********************************************************************
>
>
>
> The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
> Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership
> with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been
> certified virus free.
> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
> recorded for legal purposes.
>
>


-- 
Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Centro de Informática
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
----------------------------------------------------------------------------