Yes: machine-friendly and human-friendly are fuzzy enough :-) Also web-friendly. But "readable" is also fine: they are just synonymous. Though, the same format must be both at the same time. Regards Tomas ________________________________ From: Ghislain Atemezing [auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr] Sent: 28 April 2015 15:17 To: Annette Greiner Cc: Steven Adler; João Paulo Almeida; Bernadette Farias Lóscio; Eric Stephan; Ig Ibert Bittencourt; João Paulo Almeida; Phil Archer; public-dwbp-wg@w3.org; Yaso Subject: Re: "machine readable" Hi all, Le 27 avr. 2015 à 20:17, Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov<mailto:amgreiner@lbl.gov>> a écrit : I think this discussion needs to be based more on the specific contexts. Whether it is the best term depends on the context in which the term is used. Could we just say “machine-friendly” (for machine-readable) and “human-friendly” to re-use the metaphor of Google about “mobile-friendly”? [1,2] Ghislain [1] https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/mobile-friendly/?url=http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ [2] https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/mobile-friendly/?url=http://www.wikipedia.com --------------------------------------- Ghislain A. Atemezing, Ph.D ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com<mailto:ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com> Google+: http://google.com/+GhislainATEMEZING Twitter: @gatemezing
Received on Tuesday, 28 April 2015 13:51:53 UTC