Re: "machine readable"

Hi all,

> Le 27 avr. 2015 à 20:17, Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov> a écrit :
> 
> I think this discussion needs to be based more on the specific contexts. Whether it is the best term depends on the context in which the term is used. 


Could we just say “machine-friendly” (for machine-readable) and “human-friendly” to re-use  the metaphor of Google about “mobile-friendly”? [1,2]

Ghislain

[1] https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/mobile-friendly/?url=http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ <https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/mobile-friendly/?url=http://www.w3.org/2013/data/>
[2] https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/mobile-friendly/?url=http://www.wikipedia.com <https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/mobile-friendly/?url=http://www.wikipedia.com> 
---------------------------------------
Ghislain A. Atemezing, Ph.D
ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com
Google+: http://google.com/+GhislainATEMEZING
Twitter: @gatemezing