Re: Status on Action-174 ?

Hi Annette,

See the updated glossary definition, I think it does incorporate
Annotation/Motivation as a type of feedback in the definition along side
SIOC.  If I wrote still doesn't quite work, could you make a new proposed
revision?

Eric

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov> wrote:

>
> On Apr 23, 2015, at 3:50 PM, Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Annette,
>
>
>> --  I think the other case for citation is providing a link describing
> how you want others to cite it.
>
>
> Ah, yes, I do agree with that type of citation. I’d like to restrict its
> use to that case, maybe clarify it as PreferredCitation. In that sense, it
> is not feedback. It is something the publisher provides to consumers.
>
>
> -- While the Annotation model does cover it in a very general way thus
>> giving rise to the concern that there might be large interpretations of how
>> I think of feedback solely relying on Annotations, I am attracted to the
>> SIOC feedback model because it was built specifically to represent feedback
>> in forums. By selecting a common model for feedback, I argue that an
>> explicitly declared vocabulary greatly increases the chances of making
>> dataset feedback more discoverable because consumers can correlate and
>> cross reference feedback from different dataset forums using a consistent
>> query pattern.  The Annotation model is so general that cross referencing
>> forums represented in a variety of ways would make discovery of feedback
>> more difficult.
>
>
>
>
> I think it’s important to recognize that the annotations work is already
> in W3C space. If there is too much overlap  that we implement differently,
> there will be an internal conflict. That would be a BAD THING (TM).
>
> -Annette
>
>
>
>
> --
> Annette Greiner
> NERSC Data and Analytics Services
> Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
> 510-495-2935
>
>
>