Re: Status on Action-174 ?

Hi Eric!

I'm glad you asked. I made a very rough draft and uploaded to my fork  
on github because the doc is still with no styling and proper IDs. I  
sent it to Phil and the editors to get some feedback, but had no  
answer till now.

Basically, I picked the idea of that conversation at the f2f and  
threshed the details of the Data on the Web Life cycle proposed by  
Bernadette. The draft is at [1] and you can see it rendered at [2].

What I am proposing is that we use actions that transforms data in to  
something else, like a dataset or metadata, as turning points to  
divide whether someone is a publisher or a consumer. Furthermore, as a  
data creator can be also someone that collects data from others using  
software, like facebook or yandex, I propose that we focus on 3  
"representations" of data: data (as raw data), dataset (as encoded  
file or structured dataset) or metadata (whatever is the format).

Given this way of thinking the cycle of data on the web, data  
archiving techniques and data preparation or data planning are out of  
the scope of this WG, thought 303 pages and 404 are in. Data encoded  
in file formats is out of the scope also, but only if people involved  
with data mining and enriching wants.

The idea still have to be polished, but I think it is a good way out  
for our abstractsss discussions to focus on actions performed to  
delineate concrete lines of definitions.

I'm keen for the feedback of the WG.

[1] https://github.com/yaso/dwbp
[2] http://yaso.is/dwbp/glossary.html


Cheers
Yaso




Quoting "Eric Stephan" <ericphb@gmail.com>:

> Hi Ig,
>
> There are quite a bit of definitions floating around, I was wondering if
> you needed help on this task.  Please let me know.
>
> Eric S
>
>   https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/174
>

Received on Thursday, 23 April 2015 15:34:22 UTC