- From: Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:50:47 -0700
- To: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>, Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>, Phil Archer <phil@philarcher.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMFz4jgB4VTV06sCcOjA_RTg6pjegXALm0Ek3M0rOa1ci0EfzA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Annette, Forgive me, I remember now that you had brought up some of the original thoughts on citation at the F2F. Thank you for sharing your perspective again. I am copying your thoughts on the Action assigned to Phil for the data citation. Cheers, Eric On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov> wrote: > I *may* be the person you are thinking of as having made a strong case for > citation. I do think it is extremely important for researchers, though I > was trying to make the case for something a little different that I think > is covered by DataUsage (s/b DatasetUsage?). What happens frequently where > I work is that agencies who fund research set a requirement to report back > who uses the results and how. What this means is that funding of web-based > data-sharing efforts is dependent on our ability to report back who is > using the data we make available. Unless we make users register before > downloading, that usually means we are stuck just checking IP addresses on > download requests. Even with registration, whether and how the data is > actually used by the downloader is still a mystery. One way of finding out > who has used your data is by finding citations in published journal > articles, but this is a matter of luck (if you happen to read the article > and see an acknowledgment mentioning it). What is needed is a means of > discovering these uses without depending on the reuser to report it. > > Citations seem to me not only different from reporting usage but also > different from feedback. The stakeholders are very different, and the flow > of information is in the opposite direction in a way. The usual intent of a > citation is to show the consumer (user of an app or reader of a report, > etc.) that you’ve used authoritative sources, done your homework, and > therefore are trustworthy. So the flow is mostly from a data reuser to an > end user. On the other hand, the flow for feedback is from the data reuser > or end user to the publisher. > -Annette > -- > Annette Greiner > NERSC Data and Analytic >
Received on Friday, 17 April 2015 20:51:15 UTC