Re: dwbp-ISSUE-159 (Eric Stephan): Is R-QualityOpinions more of a Data Usage Vocabulary concept? [Data Usage Vocabulary]

Hi Antoine,

My apologies for the oversight on Christophe. I've finally included a link
to our Google docs.

In section 5 you can see [1]  Feedback as a parent class for many types of
feedback that links heavily to the data quality vocabulary.

In Section 6 we have identified have placeholders for any data quality
concepts.

This requirement stood out in my mind because it is only mentioned in the
best practices document from the consumer feedback perspective.

I am fine with the requirement staying with the DQG vocab, but just wanted
to be clear.

Thanks,

Eric S

References
[1]


https://docs.google.com/document/d/17Wqrh4SKhFcHPykGPyXlljNNw8WJgMnpwzinvvGXn0o/edit?usp=sharing


On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 4:53 AM, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote:

> Hi Eric,
>
> Thanks for the heads-up, I've tried to answer. By the way Bart has said he
> was lack time to contribute to the Q&G voc in the editor seat, and
> Christophe has volunteered to work as new co-editor! Though of course Bart
> is always welcome to come back and co-lead the work :-)
> I thought I had reported on it already in a past call. In case it wasn't
> clear I'm re-stating it now!
>
> Best,
>
> Antoine
>
> On 4/12/15 12:58 PM, Eric Stephan wrote:
>
>> Hi Antoine and Bart,
>>
>> I just wanted to call your attention to this issue I opened under the
>> Data Usage Vocabulary.  I could go either way, but wanted to be clear as
>> its role in the Data Usage Vocab.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Eric S
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 3:49 AM, Data on the Web Best Practices Working
>> Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org <mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>     dwbp-ISSUE-159 (Eric Stephan): Is R-QualityOpinions more of a Data
>> Usage Vocabulary concept? [Data Usage Vocabulary]
>>
>>     http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/159
>>
>>     Raised by: Eric Stephan
>>     On product: Data Usage Vocabulary
>>
>>     The Data Usage Vocabulary can rely on the Data Quality and
>> Granularity vocabulary to describe types of feedback, in the form of
>> metrics etc.  Data Quality descriptions can exist as an assessment
>> independently of Data Usage.  E.g. a data producer provides assessments to
>> the data producer at the time of publication.
>>
>>     Question:  Is it more natural fit for the R-QualityOpinions
>> requirements to be a part of the Data Usage Vocabulary IF R-QualityOpinions
>> is only to be used to describe consumer feedback?
>>
>>     If R-QualityOpinions is viewed as the other Data Quality vocabulary
>> requirements where opinions could be provided in some cases independent of
>> Data Usage feedback, then perhaps R-QualityOpinions should stay a part of
>> the Data Quality Vocabulary.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>