Re: dwbp-ISSUE-159 (Eric Stephan): Is R-QualityOpinions more of a Data Usage Vocabulary concept? [Data Usage Vocabulary]

Hi Antoine and Bart,

I just wanted to call your attention to this issue I opened under the Data
Usage Vocabulary.  I could go either way, but wanted to be clear as its
role in the Data Usage Vocab.

Thanks,

Eric S

On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 3:49 AM, Data on the Web Best Practices Working
Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:

> dwbp-ISSUE-159 (Eric Stephan): Is R-QualityOpinions more of a Data Usage
> Vocabulary concept? [Data Usage Vocabulary]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/159
>
> Raised by: Eric Stephan
> On product: Data Usage Vocabulary
>
> The Data Usage Vocabulary can rely on the Data Quality and Granularity
> vocabulary to describe types of feedback, in the form of metrics etc.  Data
> Quality descriptions can exist as an assessment independently of Data
> Usage.  E.g. a data producer provides assessments to the data producer at
> the time of publication.
>
> Question:  Is it more natural fit for the R-QualityOpinions requirements
> to be a part of the Data Usage Vocabulary IF R-QualityOpinions is only to
> be used to describe consumer feedback?
>
> If R-QualityOpinions is viewed as the other Data Quality vocabulary
> requirements where opinions could be provided in some cases independent of
> Data Usage feedback, then perhaps R-QualityOpinions should stay a part of
> the Data Quality Vocabulary.
>
>
>
>
>
>