- From: Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 04:29:18 -0700
- To: Deirdre Lee <deirdre@derilinx.com>
- Cc: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMFz4jhpMFWf=5zmhAE=7Rs4McvKP1hKfZe9t138Q+vCZ7TjsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Deidre, I like your suggested approach. I've included these notes in our data usage vocabulary doc, as a TODO. Thanks, Eric S On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Deirdre Lee <deirdre@derilinx.com> wrote: > Hi Eric, > In terms of 115, if it's going to remain open, can you suggest a concrete > way to resolve it? Something like: > > 1. review existing use-cases for WCAG reqs (this is what we're doing > for quality vocab) > 2. add a new use-case that specifically outlines WCAG req, and/or > 3. add to list of data usage requirements currently not covered by the > data usage vocabulary > > Cheers, > Deirdre > > > > On 08/04/2015 14:45, Eric Stephan wrote: > > I recommend we leave this action open for discussion. I don't believe > have any DWBP use cases that reflect WCAG needs. > http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/wcag . > > Can we have an agenda item for the F2F meeting discussing possible data > usage requirements currently not covered by the data usage vocabulary? > > Also, should there be a best practice from the data publisher > perspective? > > Thanks, > > Eric S > > > -- > -------------------------------------- > Deirdre Lee, Director > Derilinx - Linked & Open Data Solutions > > Web: www.derilinx.com > Email: deirdre@derilinx.com > Tel: +353 (0)1 254 4316 > Mob: +353 (0)87 417 2318 > Linkedin: ie.linkedin.com/in/leedeirdre/ > Twitter: @deirdrelee > >
Received on Friday, 10 April 2015 11:29:45 UTC