- From: Deirdre Lee <deirdre@derilinx.com>
- Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 20:11:06 +0100
- To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <55257D4A.40506@derilinx.com>
Hi Eric, In terms of 115, if it's going to remain open, can you suggest a concrete way to resolve it? Something like: 1. review existing use-cases for WCAG reqs (this is what we're doing for quality vocab) 2. add a new use-case that specifically outlines WCAG req, and/or 3. add to list of data usage requirements currently not covered by the data usage vocabulary Cheers, Deirdre On 08/04/2015 14:45, Eric Stephan wrote: > I recommend we leave this action open for discussion. I don't believe > have any DWBP use cases that reflect WCAG needs. > http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/wcag . > > Can we have an agenda item for the F2F meeting discussing possible > data usage requirements currently not covered by the data usage > vocabulary? > > Also, should there be a best practice from the data publisher perspective? > > Thanks, > > Eric S -- -------------------------------------- Deirdre Lee, Director Derilinx - Linked & Open Data Solutions Web: www.derilinx.com Email: deirdre@derilinx.com Tel: +353 (0)1 254 4316 Mob: +353 (0)87 417 2318 Linkedin: ie.linkedin.com/in/leedeirdre/ Twitter: @deirdrelee
Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2015 19:11:41 UTC