Re: Data Q&G vocabulary - report and questions for F2F

My apologies Antoine, I ended up spending most of the week on other project fires.   I will look over the weekend.

Sumit, let's make sure we take a look at Antoine's thoughts in preparation for the f2f.

Cheers

Eric s  
Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 3, 2015, at 9:42 AM, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote:
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> One week has passed since our previous report. The same situation is roughly the same. Since there was no reaction to my previous email I'm trying a different format.
> 
> We analyzed Q&G aspects in the Use Cases and Requirements FPWD:
> - assessing which requirements should be in scope for the Q&G work [1]
> - extracting the relevant Q&G stuff from the descriptions of Use Cases [2]
> 
> The outcome is that use cases have very diverse views on quality. There are two main issues for scoping the voc:
> 
> 1. Focusing on expressing metrics for data quality
> VS.
> Also expressing compliance of dataset wrt Best practices. from our BP WD.
> 
> 2. Focusing on a general framework to express metrics for data quality and exchange results along specific quality dimensions
> VS.
> Defining specific metrics with such framework.
> 
> 
> Meanwhile, we have started extracting requirements from the best practices [3]
> 
> This includes identifying 'competency questions' guiding us to add classes and properties in the voc.
> 
> In general we feel we don't have much material to continue our work.
> In fact most of the competency questions come from Riccardo, not from the best practices in the WD.
> 
> One option is to ask use case owners more precise questions. We started a questionnaire [4].
> 
> What is the group's reaction on this?
> Can this be discussed at the F2F?
> 
> I am afraid that without further input it will be hard to keep to our schedule [5], which is already very late compared to the charter.
> 
> Antoine, on behalf of Riccardo, Deirdre and Christophe.
> 
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Requirements_In_Scope_For_Quality
> [2] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Quality_Aspects_In_Use_Cases
> [3] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Requirements_From_FPWD_BP
> [4] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/QualityQuestionnaire
> [5] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Data_quality_schedule
>

Received on Friday, 3 April 2015 18:09:57 UTC