- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 18:42:15 +0200
- To: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Dear all, One week has passed since our previous report. The same situation is roughly the same. Since there was no reaction to my previous email I'm trying a different format. We analyzed Q&G aspects in the Use Cases and Requirements FPWD: - assessing which requirements should be in scope for the Q&G work [1] - extracting the relevant Q&G stuff from the descriptions of Use Cases [2] The outcome is that use cases have very diverse views on quality. There are two main issues for scoping the voc: 1. Focusing on expressing metrics for data quality VS. Also expressing compliance of dataset wrt Best practices. from our BP WD. 2. Focusing on a general framework to express metrics for data quality and exchange results along specific quality dimensions VS. Defining specific metrics with such framework. Meanwhile, we have started extracting requirements from the best practices [3] This includes identifying 'competency questions' guiding us to add classes and properties in the voc. In general we feel we don't have much material to continue our work. In fact most of the competency questions come from Riccardo, not from the best practices in the WD. One option is to ask use case owners more precise questions. We started a questionnaire [4]. What is the group's reaction on this? Can this be discussed at the F2F? I am afraid that without further input it will be hard to keep to our schedule [5], which is already very late compared to the charter. Antoine, on behalf of Riccardo, Deirdre and Christophe. [1] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Requirements_In_Scope_For_Quality [2] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Quality_Aspects_In_Use_Cases [3] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Requirements_From_FPWD_BP [4] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/QualityQuestionnaire [5] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Data_quality_schedule
Received on Friday, 3 April 2015 16:42:45 UTC