Re: Actions for all of us — from today's call

I read through a version from last week and apologize if my observations 
have already been dealt with.  Some comments:

1.  Could we include more metadata about the use cases themselves, such 
as:

        - Country
        - City
        - URL

2.  Do we need to list which team member contributed the use cases?

3.  By "Data Usage", do we mean how the data is used by the publishing 
authority or how often it is used by data consumers?  Is the data refresh 
rate included in "Data Usage"?

4.  Many use cases have redundant challenges and requirements.  Would it 
be possible to color code the redundancies and highlight the unique ones 
so as to make it easier for readers to pull out "what's new" and important 
in each use case?

5.  Someday, a table summarizing all the requirements would be wonderful.

Overall, pretty darned good first draft. 


Best Regards,

Steve

Motto: "Do First, Think, Do it Again"



From:
Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
To:
Christophe Guéret <christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl>
Cc:
Hadley Beeman <hadley@linkedgov.org>, deirdre.lee@insight-centre.org, 
Laufer <laufer@globo.com>, DWBP Public List <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Date:
05/28/2014 01:25 PM
Subject:
Re: Actions for all of us — from today's call



Hello Christophe,

Thank you very much for your comments! Yesterday, I made a pull request of 
a new version of the document with some updates on Section 4. You can find 
the updated version here [1].  Please, if possible, take a look to see if 
this new version is better.

I also agree with you that we should get ride of all the "???" of Section 
5. In some cases, we identified the requirements, but we still don't have 
any use case to make the link. If we don't have a link, then I suggest to 
remove the requirement. 

Cheers,
Bernadette

[1] https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/blob/master/usecasesv1.html



2014-05-28 11:17 GMT-03:00 Christophe Guéret <
christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl>:
Hi Hadley, Deirdre, Bernadette, Laufer,

To report on action A., I just add a look at the use-cases 14 and 17, and 
also the rest of the document. The use-cases are fine but in the rest of 
the document I found this section to be rather vague :
4. General Challenges
Extracted from all use-cases...
Metadata 
Granularity 
Data Formats 
Data Vocabularies 
Data selection 
Data access 
Sensitive Data 
Data Usage 
Identification 
Industry-reuse 
Provenance 
Licenses 

Maybe we could add a one-liner summary next to the bullet points and also 
link these to the points found in section 5 ?

Speaking about Section 5, I found that one to be too imprecise : 
R-PersArchiving
It should be possible to archive data
Motivation: DigitalArchivingofLinkedData
I know that to this point we don't have much clue about what should be 
precisely done there, we even still have to define the scope, but phrased 
as such I'm not sure this point brings anything to the use-cases. It 
sounds to me like having another requirement that reads "it should be 
possible to use data" would be as informative/useful - and we don't have 
that one. We can also wonder whether the metadata should be archived(able) 
too.
I also don't see how we can have some requirement with "Motivation: ??" 
when we agreed (if I remember correctly) that all the requirement would be 
derived from our use-cases. We should get rid of all the "??" and ground 
all the parts of Section 5 to some of the use-cases from Section 3 (and/or 
the challenges derived from this section)

Action B is done ;-)

Action C : the document looks fine to me but AFAIK archivists define a lot 
more type of meta-data, though I could not find any list to share. I'll 
get back on that with people that can provide this list and add a link in 
the wiki page.

Cheers,
Christophe


On 23 May 2014 16:12, Hadley Beeman <hadley@linkedgov.org> wrote:
Hi all,

We had a very productive meeting today — minutes to follow — but for 
simplicity, I've put our group actions together here. 

This week, in addition to your own actions, it would be great if you 
could:

A.  Review the Use Case draft and be ready to vote on transitioning it to 
first public working draft (FPWD) in next week's call. [1]

Deirdre and Bernadette are still working on polishing it and adding bits 
like the abstract, so be aware that it's not completely final.  But the 
content should be stable enough for you to know if you're happy to publish 
it or to comment via the mailing list.

(It's probably worth reminding you that FPWD is just a signal to the 
community to begin looking at the document.  It does not have to be final 
or perfect at this stage. [2] )

B.  Tell the vocabulary editors when you can join a call for the vocabs, 
via this Doodle poll.  (If you're interested in the vocabs.)  This will be 
a weekly call, covering both vocabularies. [3]

C.  Review the Guidance on the Provision of Metadata page for the Best 
Practices document.  Laufer would like you to comment on it, criticise it 
or improve it (either on the mailing list or in the wiki itself). [4]

D.  Comment on the email thread on data preservation.  Christophe and Phil 
are looking for input. [5]

Thanks a lot for a good week!  Looking forward to speaking soon.

Cheers,

   Hadley

[1]  
http://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/blob/master/usecasesv1.html

[2]  http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr#first-wd

[3]  http://doodle.com/tpp2p8fvpmchx4s4

[4]  
https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Guidance_on_the_Provision_of_Metadata

[5]  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2014May/0080.html




-- 
Onderzoeker
+31(0)6 14576494
christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl

Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)
DANS bevordert duurzame toegang tot digitale onderzoeksgegevens. Kijk op 
www.dans.knaw.nl voor meer informatie. DANS is een instituut van KNAW en 
NWO.

Let op, per 1 januari hebben we een nieuw adres: 
DANS | Anna van Saksenlaan 51 | 2593 HW Den Haag | Postbus 93067 | 2509 AB 
Den Haag | +31 70 349 44 50 | info@dans.knaw.nl | www.dans.knaw.nl

Let's build a World Wide Semantic Web!
http://worldwidesemanticweb.org/


e-Humanities Group (KNAW)




-- 
Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Centro de Informática
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
----------------------------------------------------------------------------