Re: [BP - MET] - Best Practices - Guidance on the Provision of Metadata

Hi Makx,
[Thanks for this clarification ]
> Defining a small set of mandatory fields is not easy. In the DCAT-AP Working Group with participants representing around 30 data portals from many countries, regions and cities in Europe, a very minimal set (title, description, URL) was all everyone could agree on. Even the URL is conditional, to allow for the situation that a dataset distribution is not available, either because metadata is provided before publication of the data, or is maintained after decommissioning of the data.
I also agree that we shoud specify at least title + description  to be 
mandatory.
>
> There is of course a balance to be found between making too much mandatory, which means there will be little data that follow best practice, and making too little mandatory, in which case it's hard to build a useful service on top of the metadata.
Yes, I fully agree here.
>
> In the DCAT-AP, there is, in addition to the 'mandatory' set, a set of 'recommended' fields for which publishers are strongly encouraged to provide information if at all possible.

>
> Maybe DWBP can do something similar?

Hummm...Not sure how useful could be the "recommended" fields w.r.t the 
generic "optional field" . I mean, I assume *all* the the fields 
suggested are "recommended" ones...And include "mandatory" fields. Well, 
maybe I don't understand your point here.

Ghislain
-- 
Ghislain Atemezing
EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
Campus SophiaTech
450, route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France.
e-mail: auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr & ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com
Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8178
Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~atemezin
Google+:http://google.com/+GhislainATEMEZING
Twitter:@gatemezing

Received on Friday, 16 May 2014 09:14:25 UTC