RE: Agenda for tomorrow's call

Sorry I missed the call.  The OGP Meeting was fantastic. Great to see 
Deidre and Martin and wish you all could have been here too.  Very excited 
about the work we are doing and the importance to Open Government!


Best Regards,

Steve

Motto: "Do First, Think, Do it Again"



From:
"Lee, Deirdre" <Deirdre.Lee@deri.org>
To:
"public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Date:
05/09/2014 12:50 PM
Subject:
RE: Agenda for tomorrow's call



Hi, 

I've to give my regrets too, I'm at the OGP Regional Meeting in Dublin 
with Steve and Martin. 

Bernadette and I have combined the use-cases and requirements into one doc 
and refined some of the requirements. Final step is to refer to the 
use-cases from each requirement. The latest version of the use-case doc is 
available on github.

Could we add a discussion on the use-case talk to next week's agenda?

Cheers,
Deirdre

Deirdre Lee, Research Associate, eGovernment Group
Insight Center for Data Analytics, NUI Galway, Ireland
Twitter: @deirdrelee, Skype: deirdrelee
Linkedin: ie.linkedin.com/in/leedeirdre/

________________________________________
From: Eric [ericphb@gmail.com]
Sent: 09 May 2014 08:35
To: Ivan Herman
Cc: Antoine Isaac; public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Agenda for tomorrow's call

Regrets for me as well.  I am returning late from an escience data 
reproducibility workshop.  I am interested in #2 either as a coeditor or 
contributor what ever makes the most sense.

Eric Stephan

Sent from my iPhone

> On May 8, 2014, at 11:34 PM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>
> I have another one-time call partially overlapping with this call; I 
will probably not be able to join this one. Apologies
>
> Ivan
>
>> On 09 May 2014, at 02:36 , Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Regrets from me as well, I'm on holidays...
>>
>> I'd be willing to help on #1, if I'm not the only editor.
>>
>> #8 sounds like what is needed is only a summary of parts of SKOS 
documents. I can help, but perhaps it's interesting to let someone less 
expert play with it, and my reviewing a bit later...
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Antoine
>>
>>> On 5/8/14 7:37 PM, Hadley Beeman wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I've just posted our agenda for tomorrow's call.  [1]
>>>
>>> In addition to discussing progress on our action items [2], we will 
also be agreeing who will lead each of our documents.  This is your chance 
to put your expertise into the working group's documents and to take a 
leadership role in getting our words out to where they can make a 
difference.
>>>
>>> We will be looking for editors/contributors for each of these: [3]
>>>
>>> 1. Data quality vocabulary (editor who will set the document 
structure, write at least some of the content, coordinate other 
contributors, respond to public comments, and format the documents for 
publication)
>>> 2. Data usage vocabulary (editor who will set the document structure, 
write at least some of the content, coordinate other contributors, respond 
to public comments, and format the documents for publication.)
>>> 3. Best practices document.  (Series editors, who will be "big 
picture" thinkers. They will identify areas we haven't covered but should, 
make sure the various sections can flow together, and supervise 
publication.)
>>> 4.  BP:  URI design and management for persistence: 
(editor/contributors to write at least some of the content, coordinate 
other contributors, respond to public comments)
>>> 5.  BP:  Use of core vocabularies to improve interoperability: 
(editor/contributors to write at least some of the content, coordinate 
other contributors, respond to public comments)
>>> 6.  BP:  Guidance on the provision of metadata: (editor/contributors 
to write at least some of the content, coordinate other contributors, 
respond to public comments)
>>> 7.  BP:  Publishing and accessing versions of datasets: 
(editor/contributors to write at least some of the content, coordinate 
other contributors, respond to public comments)
>>> 8.  BP:  Making controlled vocabularies accessible as URI sets: 
(editor/contributors to write at least some of the content, coordinate 
other contributors, respond to public comments)
>>> 9.  BP:  Technical factors for consideration when choosing data sets 
for publication: (editor/contributors to write at least some of the 
content, coordinate other contributors, respond to public comments)
>>> 10.  BP:  Technical factors affecting potential use of open data for 
innovation, efficiency and commercial exploitation: (editor/contributors 
to write at least some of the content, coordinate other contributors, 
respond to public comments)
>>> 11.  BP:  Data preservation: (editor/contributors to write at least 
some of the content, coordinate other contributors, respond to public 
comments)
>>> Roles can be divided between multiple, if we like. It's up to us.
>>>
>>> Please have a think about what interests you and be ready to discuss 
which part(s) you would like to work on.
>>>
>>> Looking forward to speaking to you tomorrow!
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>>  Hadley
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20140509
>>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/open
>>> [3] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Main_Page#Deliverables
>
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Digital Publishing Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> GPG: 0x343F1A3D
> WebID: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf#me
>
>
>
>
>