Re: White House Roundtable on Open Data

1. Will do. Please send the event details so I can put it in my calendar. 

2. Excellent. We need more cooperation between standards bodies and this is a terrific step forward. 



----- Original Message -----
From: Phil Archer []
Sent: 06/23/2014 07:28 PM CET
To: Steven Adler; IBM Open Data Group <>; public-dwbp-wg <>; " &lt" <>
Subject: Re: White House Roundtable on Open Data

Forgive me Steve for only just now responding to this.

First off, thank you for flying the W3C DWBP flag for us in this (self 
evidently) crucial forum. A couple of points that immediately come to mind:

1. Please be ready to talk about your model contracts event at the 
Share-PSI workshop in Lisbon, December 3-4th. I'm working on the CfP for 
that this week but the basics are as we've discussed - it's a workshop 
about encouraging more commercial use of public sector data and 
licensing is a key issue.

2. You highlighted GIS. I spent last week in a city I believe you'll 
know well, Aalborg (and I took a little time to go to Skagen too). That 
was with a geosaptial information systems crowd where, among other 
things, I was able to make more progress with the draft charter for the 
joint OGC/W3C Spatial data on the Web WG [1]. We need to dot the Is and 
cross the Ts on that yet but I'm hoping that the memberships of both 
standards bodies will be asked to formally approve the (by then 
finalised) charter next month.

Spatial data comes up in open data a lot (we had more than a day 
discussing that crossover) so it's a timely discussion.

Cheers for now



On 19/06/2014 16:34, Steven Adler wrote:
> Yesterday, I participated in an excellent Open Data Roundtable/Workshop at
> the White House Conference Center in Washington, DC.  The event was
> organized by the NYU GovLab OpenData500 and sponsored by the US Commerce
> Department and the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy.
> We were welcomed by Mark Doms, Under Secretary of Commerce for Economic
> Affairs who spoke about the importanance of Open Data is to the economic
> growth of the United States.   At a time, when the IMF and the Federal
> Reserve are forcasting low growth for several years, the US Government is
> looking at Open Data as a vast untapped resource to drive innovation and
> growth in the economy.  Commerce then presented Open Data plans from NOAA,
> Census, the Bureau of Economic Affairs, and the US Patent Office.
> We had breakout discussions on six topics and I participated in great
> discussion on GIS data.  We were 9 at my table and we were each asked to
> identify key issues for Commerce Open Data.
> I laid out these issues:
> 1.  Data Comparability Standards: Open Data is published without
> describing how data is derived or calculated and that makes it difficult
> to compare factors and figures from even within the same agency.
> 2.  Data Governance Lineage:  The US Government should publish Open Data
> with metadata that describes the governance process behind the publication
> - where the data came from, how long the department had it, how it was
> processed, who signed off on publication.
> 3.  Display:  Open Data Catalogs are great for developers but the rest of
> the nation finds reading catalogs boring.  The Government needs to provide
> analytical tools that yield insights and make connections between
> datasets.  People can relate to data stories, charts, graphs, and
> visualization.
> 4.  Data Sources and Aggregation:  Much Federal Data comes from state and
> local repositories and is aggregated without source file metadata.  The
> Census Bureau, for instance, collects housing starts data from
> municipalities and aggregates that data to provide track-level reports for
> GIS Maps.  What would be better is if every municipality published their
> own housing starts data as Open Data and the Census Bureau provided URI
> Data Links to that data, creating massively federated Linked Data
> infrastructure that minimized errors and omissions by keeping all data at
> source.
> 5.  Private Public Partnerships... The government sees constrained budgets
> for many years to come and is looking for new revenue models to offset the
> costs of Open Data publishing.  There are many datasets that the
> government could publish that would be highly valuable (like NOAA
> hurricane forecasts) but are also expensive to publish and are outside
> agency missions and goals.  The government was looking for private
> enterprise to pay for this data.
> I told the government we are already paying for it through taxes and they
> should not seek revenue recognition for stimulating economic growth with
> Open Data.  It is a national resource that Commerce should provide for
> free to make American business more competitive.  Later I had a discussion
> with the CTO's from NIST, NAO, and Census in which we agreed that Open
> Data publishing would transform government IT by shifting investment from
> a do-it-all strategy that includes infrastructure, data, and application
> development to decreasing focus on applications and increasing focus on
> just publishing the data and letting private enterprise develop
> applications instead.
> 6.  Model Contracts:  I discussed the issue of license term confusion with
> White House Office of Science and Technology Policy and they are keen to
> co-sponsor an event with us in the fall to focus nationwide attention on
> the need for Model Contracts that make Open Data really "Open for
> Business."
> The day was closed out with some passionate speeches from Bruce Andrews,
> Acting Deputy Secretary of Commerce, and Penny Pritzker, Secretary of
> Commerce.  Bruce quoted Ginni in his comments, which was wonderful, and
> Penny said that Open Data is a key initiative of the Obama Administration
> and a centerpiece of her mission at the Commerce Department.
> A lot of the comments during the day gave one the impression that the US
> Government had just discovered that their data is an asset that could
> generate economic value.  I asked the Under Secretary if Commerce would be
> using its economists to calculate the economic value of their data, and he
> answered that they would be providing a report on that topic over the
> Summer.  I spoke to him about it later and he admitted that his economists
> have never thought about this issue before and don't have any great
> insights on how to calculate economic impact of data and that the goal of
> the report is just to get them to research how to do it.
> So this event was kind of a kickoff.  Commerce feels they have some
> valuable data and they want to be seen as leaders within the government.
> The Deputy Secretary told us that the President wants Open Data to be part
> of his legacy - a program that should be so successful at generating
> economic value for the nation that it MUST survive beyond his
> administration.
> Best Regards,
> Steve
> Motto: "Do First, Think, Do it Again"


Phil Archer
W3C Data Activity Lead
+44 (0)7887 767755

Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2014 08:58:47 UTC