- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 12:09:44 +0100
- To: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Hi all, As your inbox shows, Bernadette and Deirdre are using the issue tracker to help make sense of all the comments made on the UCR doc. That adds up to 39 issues to resolve on the doc and, according to the resolution passed last week [1] they need to work through those as best they can before publication. So you can see why we're not going to publish tomorrow. I'm afraid that standards development is all about this kind of detailed work and Hadley will probably thrash through those issues on Friday. Some of the issues are editorial and will be dealt with easily but some are more detailed and probably need input from the group. Incidentally, when we do publish our work, especially when we get to Last Call, we have a separate tool that we can use to track all the comments received, the WG's resolution of those comments etc. (see [2]) - but that's not what we're doing here. I have been through each of the issues and assigned them to the UCR doc and, following Antoine's advice, have also added the two vocabularies as products to the tracker. E-mail discussions about the vocabularies should be held on the specific vocab list. Phil. [1] http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-05-30#resolution_2 [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/ -- Phil Archer W3C Data Activity Lead http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Wednesday, 4 June 2014 11:10:08 UTC