- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 16:22:25 +0200
- To: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Hi everyone, As an answer to my comment in [1], Radar Parlementar [2] has been removed from the UCR document [3]. I had suggested a mere merging, because I think that the application case is quite interesting. It gives an example of how these basic data platforms can be used. For example we could now add in the Potential Audience for dados.gov.br, developers of application/website for Brazilian citizens (but probably this is not the only audience). One motivation for having removed the case was that it was missing requirements. True, but that was in the current form. Would it be possible to come back to the author of the case and ask her whether she can recognize whether some of our current requirements are relevant for her case? While I'm at it, some typos: - dados.gov.br became data.gov.br in the first sentence - CKAN is said to be 'more' independent. More independent than what? - typo "inn the portal" Best, Antoine [1] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/26 [2] http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Use_Cases#Radar_Parlamentar [3] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/usecasesv1.html
Received on Friday, 18 July 2014 14:22:56 UTC