- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:01:49 +0100
- To: <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
(anticipating on the call) Yes it's good but it needs to be completed. It's just question on very specific point. I mean, it seems one could answer all the questions in a way that would not describe the main scenario of the case (what is it about in general, who are the intended users etc) Antoine On 2/28/14 1:55 PM, Christophe Guéret wrote: > +1 to having a template! I've tried to structure a bit the case about the Dutch registers but would be happy to follow any other proposition. > > Christophe > > > On 28 February 2014 13:43, Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com <mailto:mail@makxdekkers.com>> wrote: > > All, > > I had a quick look at the use case template at > https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Use_Cases#Common_Questions_to_Ask_Each > _Use_Case_.3D. > > I think it is really good to have such a template so that use cases > become more comparable. > > I have some comments though: > > 1. The questions refer to undifferentiated "data" -- maybe we can add a > question to ask which domain(s) the data covers. We should also ask > about the data types and formats, and about data and metadata standards > they use, if any. > > 2. The questions refer also to "Open Data" -- sometimes use cases may be > related to non-open data, for example data that is exchanged between > agencies. Are we indeed limiting the scope exclusively to data that > published under an open licence? > > 3. Questions 3 and 4 focus on 'citizens' -- maybe the questions could be > rephrased to ask the data publisher which audiences they target; these > will probably be technical developers, transparency advocates, the press > or companies that want to re-use the data for some purpose, rather than > the general citizen. > > 4. In question 3, there is an implied perspective that "data" is > published in a certain format (which?) and that the source data is > converted from other formats. Is this always the case? And what is "web" > as other form? We are here looking at "Data on the Web", so why would > "web" be another form? > > 5. In various questions (e.g. 9, 19, 22) it is implied that we're > looking mostly at city-based or at least localised initiatives. I don't > think we should limit it to that. At the moment, I am contacting people > who run initiatives that involve international networks of data > providers and aggregators, and initiatives that have a national or > transnational focus, and I don't think we should exclude such cases. > > Happy to discuss. > > Makx. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Onderzoeker > +31(0)6 14576494 > christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl <mailto:christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl> > > *Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)* > > DANS bevordert duurzame toegang tot digitale onderzoeksgegevens. Kijk op www.dans.knaw.nl <http://www.dans.knaw.nl> voor meer informatie. DANS is een instituut van KNAW en NWO. > > > Let op, per 1 januari hebben we een nieuw adres: > > DANS | Anna van Saksenlaan 51 | 2593 HW Den Haag | Postbus 93067 | 2509 AB Den Haag | +31 70 349 44 50 | info@dans.knaw.nl <mailto:info@dans.kn> | www.dans.knaw.nl > > > *Let's build a World Wide Semantic Web!* > http://worldwidesemanticweb.org/ > > *e-Humanities Group (KNAW)* > eHumanities <http://www.ehumanities.nl/>
Received on Friday, 28 February 2014 13:02:20 UTC