Re: Lifecycle "Big picture"--quick and dirty draft

Hello,

@Ghislain, thank you very much for drawing the “big picture” for our
Lifecycle.

@Christophe, thanks for the comments!

I'm gonna try to explain some ideas behind the lifecycle :)

I think that Creation and Archiving shouldn't be together. I think that
after creation, we should have publication. Then, after publication, we may
have access, refinement or archiving. After access, we may have External
use and after that Feedback. I suppose that we can't have Feedback without
External use.

I used the abstract lifecycle model proposed by [1] as the basis for our
lifecycle, but I don't agree with the description of the Archiving phase.
In my opinion, Archiving should be "the moment when data is removed from
the Web" instead of Termination. Then, in this case, we won't have the
Termination phase.

Does it make sense for you?

Cheers,
Bernadette

[1] Knud Möller. Lifecycle models of data-centric systems and domains: The
abstract data lifecycle model. 2012. Semantic Web 4.1: 67-88. URL:
http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/content/lifecycle-models-data-centric-systems-and-domains





2014-12-13 6:01 GMT-03:00 Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>:
>
> Hi Christophe ,
> jajaja.. Thanks for reminding me those all time of “Terminator”, ;-)
>
> Do you mean that previous version of a dataset gets archived when a new
> one is made ?
>
> I was also confused. So, now we can start debating this...
>
> Or would you suggest to always archive a newly created dataset ?
>
> I just followed what is written in this section.
> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#lifecycle
> So, I am not the “creator” of the terms…
>
> Best,
> Ghislain
>


-- 
Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Centro de Informática
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
----------------------------------------------------------------------------