RE: Some thoughts on the Q&G vocab

Hi Phil:

We also use Enterprise Architect.

Best Regards

Eric

-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Archer [mailto:phila@w3.org] 
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 11:44 AM
To: DWBP Vocabs; Eric Kauz; Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Subject: Some thoughts on the Q&G vocab

Dear all,

As mentioned on today's call, I've been looking at the data quality and granularity vocabulary. Taking the discussion at the f2f meeting [1], Makx's work under the Eu ISA Programme [2] and the ODI Certificates [3] as my starting points, I worked through the issues and made notes in the wiki. Based on that I then created the diagram. All of which is available at [4].

Eric - you kindly offered to help with the UML modelling, thank you. 
I've used Enterprise Architect for this - is that what you use by any chance?

I think there are several high level talking points:

1. What are we trying to achieve - machine readability? Links to human readable documentation? Objectivity? Subjectivity?

2. How are we going to test this? Bernadette is building a CKAN extension for the data usage vocab - Bernadette - can it take on this vocab as well? (I hope so). The plan so far is for the two vocabs to be Notes, not Recommendations. That means we don't have to prove implementation. However... without implementation nothing is a standard and if we can take the vocabs through to Recommendation (i.e. prove multiple implementations) then they'll have a lot more weight.

Any and all comments welcome. If focussing on a particular issue, please start a new thread.

Cheers

Phil.


[1] http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-04-01#Data_quality_task_force

[2] http://www.slideshare.net/OpenDataSupport/open-data-quality-29248578
(Slide 8)
[3] https://certificates.theodi.org/overview
[4]
https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Quality_and_Granularity_Description_Vocabulary

-- 


Phil Archer
W3C Data Activity Lead
http://www.w3.org/2013/data/

http://philarcher.org
+44 (0)7887 767755
@philarcher1

CONFIDENTIALITY / DISCLAIMER: The contents of this e-mail are  confidential and are not to be regarded as a contractual offer or acceptance from GS1 (registered in Belgium). 
If you are not the addressee, or if this has been copied or sent to you in error, you must not use data herein for any purpose, you must delete it, and should inform the sender. 
GS1 disclaims liability for accuracy or completeness, and opinions expressed are those of the author alone. 
GS1 may monitor communications. 
Third party rights acknowledged. 
(c) 2012.
</a>

Received on Monday, 5 May 2014 19:27:04 UTC