- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 16:44:26 +0100
- To: DWBP Vocabs <public-dwbp-vocabs@w3.org>, Eric Kauz <eric.kauz@gs1.org>, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
Dear all, As mentioned on today's call, I've been looking at the data quality and granularity vocabulary. Taking the discussion at the f2f meeting [1], Makx's work under the Eu ISA Programme [2] and the ODI Certificates [3] as my starting points, I worked through the issues and made notes in the wiki. Based on that I then created the diagram. All of which is available at [4]. Eric - you kindly offered to help with the UML modelling, thank you. I've used Enterprise Architect for this - is that what you use by any chance? I think there are several high level talking points: 1. What are we trying to achieve - machine readability? Links to human readable documentation? Objectivity? Subjectivity? 2. How are we going to test this? Bernadette is building a CKAN extension for the data usage vocab - Bernadette - can it take on this vocab as well? (I hope so). The plan so far is for the two vocabs to be Notes, not Recommendations. That means we don't have to prove implementation. However... without implementation nothing is a standard and if we can take the vocabs through to Recommendation (i.e. prove multiple implementations) then they'll have a lot more weight. Any and all comments welcome. If focussing on a particular issue, please start a new thread. Cheers Phil. [1] http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-04-01#Data_quality_task_force [2] http://www.slideshare.net/OpenDataSupport/open-data-quality-29248578 (Slide 8) [3] https://certificates.theodi.org/overview [4] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Quality_and_Granularity_Description_Vocabulary -- Phil Archer W3C Data Activity Lead http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Friday, 2 May 2014 15:44:58 UTC