- From: Wes Turner <wes.turner@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 05:13:17 -0600
- To: "public-dwbp-comments@w3.org" <public-dwbp-comments@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2017 11:13:50 UTC
Guidance regarding the need for and advantages of including units from a standard system of units vocabulary is ever-needed. A few relevant threads (from searching for "qudt"): "URIs / Ontology for Physical Units and Quantities" https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2014Jan/0157.html https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2015May/thread.html#msg3 "Re: Are there any plans to develop an OWL version of QUDT?" https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2014May/0065.html "Re: Improvement of www.schema.org/menu" https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2017Jan/0007.html Vocabularies: UNECE UN/CEFACT - Not (yet?) RDF URIs QUDT 1.1 QUDT 2.0 (in progress, needs review) - Mappings to UN/CEFACT Todo: Is this in scope for DWBP? LD
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2017 11:13:50 UTC