- From: Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 04:06:43 -0800
- To: Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>
- Cc: W3C DWBP WG - Comments <public-dwbp-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMFz4jgAM8duvTFEmf=XwWLWvRKRQ-YuyNq8CjYvKn6OZtEN+g@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Andrea, In terms of the use of biro:isReferencedBy [1], I believe we are using this correctly. We used the definition as found in the original vocabulary and believe it is being used consistently within the domain and range allowed. I will doublecheck to make sure we are not inconsistent. Kind regards, Eric References [1] http://www.sparontologies.net/ontologies/biro/source.html#d4e82 On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa. eu> wrote: > Dear DWBP WG, > > I have a question about the use of property biro:isReferencedBy (and its > inverse biro:references) in DUV. > > The definition given in DUV [1] (as in BiRO [2]) reads as follows: > > [[ > The relation between a publication and the bibliographic record or > bibliographic reference describing it. > ]] > > My understanding is that biro:isReferencedBy (biro:references) can be used > to link a dataset / distribution to its bib reference. However, elsewhere > in the DUV specification, this property is used to link a dataset / > distribution to a resource (e.g., a publication) citing it. > > In case I got it right, this use case doesn't seem to be fit for > biro:isReferencedBy, but rather is in line with the definition of > dct:isReferencedBy [3]. > > Thanks in advance, and sorry for raising this issue only in this late > stage. > > Andrea > > ---- > [1]https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-duv/#Property:isReferencedBy > [2]http://www.sparontologies.net/ontologies/biro/source.html#d4e82 > [3]http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-isReferencedBy > > -- > Andrea Perego, Ph.D. > Scientific / Technical Project Officer > European Commission DG JRC > Directorate B - Growth and Innovation > Unit B6 - Digital Economy > Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262 > 21027 Ispra VA, Italy > > https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/ > > ---- > The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may > not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official > position of the European Commission. > > >
Received on Thursday, 24 November 2016 12:07:19 UTC