- From: Michel Dumontier <michel.dumontier@stanford.edu>
- Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 11:06:53 -0700
- To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Cc: "public-dwbp-comments@w3.org" <public-dwbp-comments@w3.org>
Dear Phil & DWBP team, Great work! I find the document easy to read and the examples are clear. I found one technical issue: Best practice 3 uses dct:conformsTo, but the range of this is a URI of type dct:Standard, so it should be a URI for the ISO spec. one social: if one wants to follow BP31 - enrich data by generating new data - but that person is not the original data provider - i'd recommend that they make their contribution public (rather than republishing the whole dataset), with a machine readable provenance description of the work, and contribute the enrichment back to the original data provider. Cheers, m. Michel Dumontier, PhD Associate Professor of Medicine (Biomedical Informatics) Stanford University http://dumontierlab.com On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote: > Dear all, > > The Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group very recently published > three documents in what in the old days we'd have referred to as Last Call. > There are two vocabularies (that will be Notes) and one Best Practice > Document which is on the Rec Track. > > I *believe* that the two vocabularies [1, 2] will not need your attention. > They set out a data model and terms used - which, like any vocabulary, can > be localised. The Best Practices document refers specifically to locale in > one of its BPs and it's that one [3] for which we specifically are seeking > your review please. I don't think the doc as a whole will need a detailed > review - but of course you're better judges of that than we are. Its > normative content is the intended outcomes, which are written in very > general terms. We then offer *possible implementations*, none of which > define new technologies. > > It's a loooong doc, so I hope for all our sakes that I'm right that a full > review is not necessary - especially as we're hoping to move to CR for the > Best Practices Doc by the end of June so we're asking for reviews by Sunday > 12th. > > Thanks > > Phil. > > [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-vocab-dqv-20160519/ > [2] https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-vocab-duv-20160519/ > [3] https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-dwbp-20160519/#LocaleParametersMetadata > > -- > > > Phil Archer > W3C Data Activity Lead > http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ > > http://philarcher.org > +44 (0)7887 767755 > @philarcher1 >
Received on Friday, 27 May 2016 18:07:47 UTC