Re: Request for review of Data on the Web Best Practices

Hi Phil,

Also wanted to say - if you want to join the PING call and discuss this a
bit in a less asynchronous manner, it's happening tomorrow, I've C/Ped the
details below:


Privacy Interest Group Meetings
  Next call: 26th May 2016
  9am PT, 12pm ET, 6pm CET

     WebEx meeting
     https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=meda7c1b71d647aefa4377d4610c67648

     +1 617-324-0000
     meeting number: 648 986 475

Please also join us in IRC in the #privacy room.
     Server: irc.w3.org
     Username: <your name>
     Port: 6667 or 6665
     Channel: #privacy

https://www.w3.org/Privacy/


/********************************************/
Greg Norcie (norcie@cdt.org)
Staff Technologist
Center for Democracy & Technology
District of Columbia office
(p) 202-637-9800
PGP: http://norcie.com/pgp.txt

/*******************************************/

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 3:23 AM, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote:

> Looks like you got that gig then, Eric - thank you!
>
> As you know, Eric, it's the privacy issues that you raised about data and
> metadata that are the potential overlap. I don't imagine the PING folks
> will have a lot to say about persistent identifiers, API calls etc. so I
> hope that we can minimise what we're asking Greg and his colleagues to do.
>
> Thanks
>
> Phil.
>
>
> On 24/05/2016 20:41, Eric Stephan wrote:
>
>> Hi Greg, Phil, and DWBP WG,
>>
>> It almost seems like a matrix (table) of privacy questions and the best
>> practices would be useful, blank cells could reflect non-applicability.
>> What do you think?  If it is useful, I am happy to help.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Eric Stephan
>> Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
>>
>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Greg Norcie <gnorcie@cdt.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Phil,
>>>
>>> Thanks for reaching out! Sorry to hear about your tight deadline.
>>>
>>> In order to speed things up, as a first, step, could you or someone from
>>> the HTML5 team please use the PING Privacy Questionnaire[1] to do an
>>> initial self review of your standard? (We would also love to get feedback
>>> on how the privacy questionnaire can be improved :) )
>>>
>>> I'd be happy to work with you and your team to identify any remaining
>>> issues that may be present in addition to those uncovered by the self
>>> review.
>>>
>>> There is a PING call on 5/26 as well in case you want to join in and
>>> discuss further.
>>>
>>> [1] http://gregnorc.github.io/ping-privacy-questions/
>>>
>>>
>>> /********************************************/
>>> Greg Norcie (norcie@cdt.org)
>>> Staff Technologist
>>> Center for Democracy & Technology
>>> District of Columbia office
>>> (p) 202-637-9800
>>> PGP: http://norcie.com/pgp.txt
>>>
>>> /*******************************************/
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear Ping members,
>>>>
>>>> The Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group has published three
>>>> documents that are close to completion, two of which we'd be grateful if
>>>> you could review. In general, privacy issues don't arise in this work
>>>> but:
>>>>
>>>> 1. The Data on the Web Best Practices document itself has references to
>>>> privacy in its introduction [1] and in a section on data enrichment [2].
>>>>
>>>> 2. The WG's charter [3] includes the line: "Ensure that the privacy
>>>> concerns are properly included in the Quality and Granularity
>>>> vocabulary."
>>>> The vocabulary in question is at [4] and we would be grateful if you
>>>> could
>>>> confirm that no specific privacy issues are raised by that work (I
>>>> think it
>>>> unlikely but I may be missing something).
>>>>
>>>> The WG plans to make the transition to CR for its BP doc (which is Rec
>>>> Track) during next month so we're setting a (very) tight deadline on
>>>> comments of 12 June.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your help,
>>>>
>>>> Phil.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-dwbp-20160519/#intro
>>>> [2] https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-dwbp-20160519/#enrichment
>>>> [3] https://www.w3.org/2013/05/odbp-charter#coordination
>>>> [4] https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-vocab-dqv-20160519/
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Phil Archer
>>>> W3C Data Activity Lead
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
>>>>
>>>> http://philarcher.org
>>>> +44 (0)7887 767755
>>>> @philarcher1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> --
>
>
> Phil Archer
> W3C Data Activity Lead
> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
>
> http://philarcher.org
> +44 (0)7887 767755
> @philarcher1
>